Skip to content
William G Davis Charitable Tr #1564-7 at a glance

· Private foundation

William G Davis Charitable Tr #1564-7

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$324kHealth$4kHuman Services$2kReligion$900Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,017
Median grant
1
States reached
$700k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANDREW GLAS CO PNC BANK$9,496
HENRY ORLANDINI CO PNC BANK$7,910
SAGE MCHATTIE CO PNC BANK$6,776
THOMAS DRY CO PNC BANK$5,250
GRACE DRY CO PNC BANK$4,570
GARRETT RADER CO PNC BANK$2,017
ANTHONY ORLANDINI CO PNC BANK$1,908
UNION AID SOCIETY OF SEWICKLEY$100
SEWICKLEY VALLEY YMCA$100
ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 7% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY OF: $100 → 6%SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY: $2k → 9%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BEAVER: $1k → 10%SEWICKLEY VALLEY YMCA: $200 → 11%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $9k → 13%MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY: $14k → 13%INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1k → 14%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 22%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 12%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BEAVER: $860 → 10%ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH: $100 → 11%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $3k → 13%MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%UNION AID SOCIETY OF SEWICKLEY: $100 → 11%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $2k → 13%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 22%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $884 → 12%ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH: $100 → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY OF SEWICKLEY: $100 → 11%ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH: $100 → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY OF SEWICKLEY: $100 → 11%SEWICKLEY VALLEY YMCA: $100 → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY OF SEWICKLEY: $100 → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY OF SEWICKLEY: $100 → 11%ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH: $100 → 11%JORDYN OCH: $13k → 11%EMILY MEDWID: $8k → 11%MADISON WILSON: $5k → 11%ALEXA MANKO: $4k → 11%JACK ARENA: $3k → 11%CLAYTON GLAS: $2k → 11%BRIAN BERGMANN: $189 → 11%DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 11%DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%LA ROCHE COLLEGE: $3k → 11%LA ROCHE COLLEGE: $2k → 11%ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%UNIVERITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%UNIVERITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%ANDREW GLAS CO PNC BANK: $9k → 11%HENRY ORLANDINI CO PNC BANK: $8k → 11%SAGE MCHATTIE CO PNC BANK: $7k → 11%THOMAS DRY CO PNC BANK: $5k → 11%GRACE DRY CO PNC BANK: $5k → 11%GARRETT RADER CO PNC BANK: $2k → 11%ANTHONY ORLANDINI CO PNC BANK: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$251k · 23 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
15

Total granted

$251k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-3%

Still filing today

30%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
    2× · 2017–2018 · $23k · revenue +29%
  • MU
    Marywood University
    2× · 2018–2019 · $17k · revenue +21%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Roosevelt University

Roosevelt university is an independent, non-profit, metropolitan university and national leader in educating socially conscious citizens for active and dedicated lives as leaders in their professions and their communities. the university's…

—
7
Mercyhurst University

Rooted in our Mercy Catholic liberal arts identity, we educate and inspire diverse learners in an environment where faith and reason flourish together for meaningful lives, dignified work, and leadership in service toward a just and loving…

Education
8
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
9
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
12
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Reldon & Hattie Cooper Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $25,380 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $23,158 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $19,081 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $18,985 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $16,967 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRELDON & HATTIE COOPER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $11,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,109 · OtherBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,179 · OtherANDREW GLAS CO PNC BANK: $9,496 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,168 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,626 · Other+27 more: $89,923 · Other+27 moreDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $22,542 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE H…Marywood University: $17,392 · EducationMarywood UniversityUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $14,666 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $13,215 · EducationWESTMINSTER COLLEGETemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $12,298 · EducationTemple University - Of The C…LA ROCHE UNIVERSITY: $5,480 · EducationLA ROCHE UNIVERSITYNATIONAL BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICAL EXAMINERS: $3,823 · Health
Other$253,572Education$85,593Health$3,823

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $22,542 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarywood University: $17,392 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $14,666 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $13,215 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $12,298 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRELDON & HATTIE COOPER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $5,672 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA ROCHE UNIVERSITY: $5,480 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICAL EXAMINERS: $3,823 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds Marywood University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds RELDON & HATTIE COOPER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LA ROCHE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICAL EXAMINERS ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William G Davis Charitable Tr #1564-7 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William G Davis Charitable Tr #1564-7. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William G Davis Charitable Tr #1564-7’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home