Skip to content
William F & Emma Cg Hoover Trust Under Wil at a glance

· Private foundation

William F & Emma Cg Hoover Trust Under Wil

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$566
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$46kHealth$500Housing & Shelter$500Human Services$400Public Safety & Disaster$250Membership Benefit$250Philanthropy$100
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$566
Median grant
1
States reached
$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOWER PATH VALLEY PRESBY CHURCH$566
DOYLESBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$566
CARRICK COMMUNITY CHURCH$566
DRY RUN CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN$566
HORSE VALLEY GOSPEL MISSION$566
AMBERSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$566
MISSION CHURCH IN BURNS VALLEY$566
CONCORD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$566
FORT LOUDON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$566
TRINITY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$566
PENTECOSTAL CHURCH$566
LAUREL GROVE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$566
MENNONITE CHURCH$566
SPRING RUN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$566
REFORMED CHURCH$566
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MENNONITE CHURCH: $639 → 9%MISSION CHURCH IN BURNS VALLEY: $639 → 11%UPPER PATH VALLEY PRESBY CHURCH: $639 → 9%MISSION CHURCH IN BURNS VALLEY: $566 → 11%LAUREL GROVE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $639 → 9%MISSION CHURCH IN BURNS VALLEY: $562 → 11%AMBERSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $639 → 9%SPRING RUN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $639 → 9%MENNONITE CHURCH: $566 → 9%AMBERSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $566 → 9%UPPER PATH VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $566 → 9%LAUREL GROVE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $566 → 9%SPRING RUN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $566 → 9%LAUREL GROVE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $562 → 9%MENNONITE CHURCH: $562 → 9%UPPER PATH VALLEY PRESBY CHURCH: $562 → 9%SPRING RUN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $562 → 9%AMBERSON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $562 → 9%AMBERSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $562 → 9%DRY RUN CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN: $639 → 9%DOYLESBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $639 → 9%DOYLESBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $566 → 9%DRY RUN CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN: $566 → 9%DOYLESBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $562 → 9%DRY RUN CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN: $562 → 9%PENTECOSTAL CHURCH: $639 → 9%CONCORD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $639 → 9%PENTECOSTAL CHURCH: $566 → 9%CONCORD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $566 → 9%PENTECOSTAL CHURCH: $562 → 9%CONCORD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $562 → 9%HORSE VALLEY GOSPEL MISSION: $639 → 9%REFORMED CHURCH: $639 → 9%LOWER PATH VALLEY PRESBY CHURCH: $639 → 9%LOWER PATH VALLEY PRESBY CHURCH: $566 → 9%REFORMED CHURCH: $566 → 9%HORSE VALLEY GOSPEL MISSION: $566 → 9%REFORMED CHURCH: $562 → 9%LOWER PATH VALLEY PRESBY CHURCH: $562 → 9%HORSE VALLEY GOSPEL MISSION: $562 → 9%CARRICK METAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $639 → 9%FORT LOUDON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $639 → 9%TRINITY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $639 → 9%TRINITY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $566 → 9%CARRICK COMMUNITY CHURCH: $566 → 9%FORT LOUDON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $566 → 9%CARRICK METAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $562 → 9%FORT LOUDON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $562 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$47k · 24 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$47k
$562

Still filing today

8%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $666 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DOYLESBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    5× · 2020–2025 · $3k
  • LP
    LOWER PATH VALLEY PRESBY CHURCH
    5× · 2020–2025 · $3k
  • FL
    FORT LOUDON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    5× · 2020–2025 · $3k

Funded once

  • AP
    AMBERSON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $562
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOYLESBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherDOYLESBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCHLOWER PATH VALLEY PRESBY CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherLOWER PATH VALLEY PRESBY CHURCHFORT LOUDON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherFORT LOUDON UNITED METHODIST CHURCHAMBERSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherAMBERSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCHDRY RUN CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN: $2,828 · OtherDRY RUN CHURCH OF THE BRETHRENSPRING RUN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherSPRING RUN UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCONCORD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherCONCORD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHLAUREL GROVE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherLAUREL GROVE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHORSE VALLEY GOSPEL MISSION: $2,828 · OtherHORSE VALLEY GOSPEL MISSIONPENTECOSTAL CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherPENTECOSTAL CHURCHMENNONITE CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherMENNONITE CHURCHMISSION CHURCH IN BURNS VALLEY: $2,828 · OtherMISSION CHURCH IN BURNS VALLEYTRINITY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $2,828 · OtherTRINITY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTREFORMED CHURCH: $2,828 · OtherREFORMED CHURCHCARRICK METAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2,262 · OtherUPPER PATH VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1,627 · Other+9 more: $3,829 · Other+9 moreCHAMBERSBURG HOSPITAL: $500 · HealthCORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$47,310Health$500Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAMBERSBURG HOSPITAL: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME: $500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPATH VALLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATION 001599: $250 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE JOHN H SHOOK FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAMBERSBURG HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME ↗
  • Who funds PATH VALLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATION 001599 ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN H SHOOK FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William F & Emma Cg Hoover Trust Under Wil funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William F & Emma Cg Hoover Trust Under Wil. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William F & Emma Cg Hoover Trust Under Wil’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home