Skip to content

· Private foundation

William and Barbara Day Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$63kHealth$54kEducation$49kFood & Nutrition$15kInternational$8kReligion$5kAnimals$2k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,783
Median grant
3
States reached
$234k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wounded Warrior Project$3,783
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$3,783
Individual grant recipient$3,783
Helen Matthew's Elementary PTA$3,783
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $4k → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$163k · 7 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$163k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+98%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Children's Mercy Hospital
    4× · 2020–2023 · $51k · revenue +43%
  • PH
    PROJECT HOPE INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue +34%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AE
    ALONGSIDE EDUCATION MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -99% · 30% of their budget
  • CO
    Connecting Our Paths Eternally
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • CM
    CHILDRENS MERCY
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEBANON R3 SCHOOLS: $34,000 · OtherLEBANON R3 SCHOOLSSALVATION ARMY: $27,216 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $24,696 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHelen Matthew's Elementary PTA: $10,946 · OtherHelen Matthew's Elementary PTAALONGSIDE EDUCATION MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · OtherConnecting Our Paths Eternally: $3,697 · Other+1 more: $3,000 · OtherThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $50,966 · HealthThe Children's Mercy HospitalCONVOY OF HOPE: $14,803 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOP…PROJECT HOPE INC: $8,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE …WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,480 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,783 · EducationHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $2,000 · Animals
Other$108,555Health$50,966International$22,803Human Services$7,480Education$3,783Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $50,966 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $14,803 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,480 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALONGSIDE EDUCATION MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALONGSIDE EDUCATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William and Barbara Day Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William and Barbara Day Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William and Barbara Day’s filings →

More from the funding graph