Skip to content

· Public charity

Willamette Valley Track & Field Inc

Support the development of amateur and youth athletics, primarily in the sports of track and field and cross country running.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$672kYouth Development$18kAnimals$18kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $167,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $177,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $148k
$12,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Oregon State Univ Foundation$27,500
Duck Athletic Fund$25,000
Individual grant recipient$18,000
Ducks of a Feather$18,000
Portland Track$15,000
Rothenberger Running LLC$12,000
Ultimook$12,000
Sport Oregon$10,000
Track Town USA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Gosportz Media LLC$6,000
Linus Pauling Track and Field$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Maupin Area Chamber Endowment: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Willamette Valley Track & Field Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in OR; by stated purpose, 68%.

Willamette Valley Track & Field Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$635k · 9 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$635k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+17%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $187k · revenue +50%
  • PT
    PORTLAND TRACK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $116k · revenue +15%
  • TU
    TrackTown USA Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +208%

Funded once

  • OA
    Oregon Amateur Sports Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • MA
    MAUPIN AREA CHAMBER ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -96%
  • OS
    Oregon Sports Authority Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Sports Authority

The mission of the Oregon Sports Authority, dba Sport Oregon, is to drive economic growth and enhance quality of life in Oregon through sports. This is accomplished through our work with state and regional tourism bureaus, event promoters,…

—
2
Oregon Track Club Elite Inc
—
3
Eastern Oregon University Foundation

Established in 1964 for the philanthropic benefit of Eastern Oregon University, the Foundation raises funds to support the mission of Eastern Oregon University.

Education
4
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
5
Oregon Athletic Booster Club Inc

Support of oregon athletics

Education
6
Oregon Association of Public Accountants Scholarsh
—
7
State of Oregon Sports Hall of Fame

Create and maintain educational materials of Oregon sports history. Conduct annual induction ceremony to celebrate great Oregon sports individuals and teams. Provide educational scholarships.

Arts & Culture
8
Oregon Innovation Foundation

To ignite and amplify a culture of creative problem solving and empower the next generation of innovators to meet some of the biggest challenges facing our state.

Science & Tech
9
Oregon Music Festival

Oregon Music Festival's mission is the performance, production, and promotion of classical music through orchestral, choral/orchestra, and chamber music.

Arts & Culture
10
The Oregon Community Foundation Trust

The oregon community foundation trust is a supporting organization of the oregon community foundation (ocf). the trust makes grants that further the mission of ocf which is to improve the lives of all oregonians through the power of…

Philanthropy
11
Oregon Student Foundation

Oregon student foundation is oregon student association's (osa) 501(c)(3) related organization that provides the additional support that the student led osa needs to ensure that every oregonian has access to a quality, affordable education.

Education
12
Oregon Athlete Foundation

To further student-athletes' exceptional experience at the university of oregon by providing them an organization that will help with their transition to becoming alumni.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oregon Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Maupin Area Chamber Endowment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $186,940 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATIONOregon State University Foundation: $82,500 · EducationOregon State University FoundationPORTLAND TRACK: $115,500 · Recreation & SportsPORTLAND TRACKTrackTown USA Inc: $70,000 · Recreation & SportsTrackTown USA IncUltimook: $56,500 · Recreation & SportsUltimookOregon Sports Authority Foundation: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsOregon Sports Authority FoundationRothenberger Running LLC: $64,800 · OtherRothenberger Running LLCSport Oregon: $30,000 · OtherSport OregonOregon Amateur Sports Foundation: $25,000 · OtherOregon Amateur Sports Foundatio…Ducks of a Feather: $18,000 · OtherDucks of a FeatherGosportz Media LLC: $18,000 · OtherGosportz Media LLCIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMt Hood Ski Education Found: $15,000 · OtherMt Hood Ski Education FoundCorvallis School District 509J: $11,200 · OtherCorvallis School District 509JIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherMAUPIN AREA CHAMBER ENDOWMENT: $15,000 · Human Services
Education$269,440Recreation & Sports$257,000Other$208,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $186,940 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND TRACK: $115,500 over 7y, 16% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $82,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrackTown USA Inc: $70,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUltimook: $56,500 over 5y, 25% of budgetMAUPIN AREA CHAMBER ENDOWMENT: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND TRACK ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TrackTown USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ultimook ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Amateur Sports Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAUPIN AREA CHAMBER ENDOWMENT ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Sports Authority Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willamette Valley Track & Field Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willamette Valley Track & Field Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Willamette Valley Track & Field Inc?

Find your warmest path to Willamette Valley Track & Field Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Willamette Valley Track & Field’s filings →

More from the funding graph