· Public charity
Wildlife Management Institute Inc
Founded in 1911, wildlife management institute, inc.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $94k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $685k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHASE & CHASE CONSULTING | $153,150 |
| BRANDT INFORMATION SERVICES LLC | $150,000 |
| DJ CASE AND ASSOCIATES | $137,927 |
| THE PEREGRINE FUND | $89,350 |
| JEFF SHAW CONSULTING | $54,425 |
| OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES | $50,000 |
| ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & NATURAL RESOURCES | $50,000 |
| CENTRAL FLYWAY COUNCIL | $30,872 |
| RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT | $27,331 |
| HUNTERS OF COLOR | $25,000 |
| SOUTHWICK ASSOCIATES | $10,761 |
| INNOVATIVE OUTCOMES | $8,500 |
| BAYLOR UNIVERSITY | $6,321 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: National Shooting Sports Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Wildlife Management Institute Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wildlife Management Institute Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Hunters of Color: 4% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wildlife Management Institute Inc?
Find your warmest path to Wildlife Management Institute Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Wildlife Management Institute’s filings →