Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Wildarkorg Inc

It is the mission of WildArk.org to promote and support activities that educate, enable, provide resources to, or inspire all of humanity to sustainably conserve, protect or restore the environment and the worlds ecosystems, natural resources, wildlife or wild places.

$92k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of Wildarkorg Inc’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Charities Aid Foundation America, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Wildarkorg Inc named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $87k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
20
1
21
6
22
2
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Animals$875kInternational$38kEnvironment$38k
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $87,461 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $92,461 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$44k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL$30,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK$20,000
GIRAFFE CONSERVATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE PEACE PARKS$10,000
DIAN FOSSEY FUND$10,000
REWILD$7,461
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK: $20k → 10%SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 17%GIRAFFE CONSERVATION: $10k → 13%DIAN FOSSEY FUND: $10k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE PEACE PARKS: $10k → 12%BIG LIFE FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE PEACE PARKS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
3
Wildlife Conservation Global Inc

Wildlife conservation global, inc. operates the okapi conservation project (ocp) which works in the democratic republic of the congo with the institute in congo for the conservation of nature (iccn) and local communities throughout the…

Animals
4
Space for Giants Usa Inc

To help protect Africas remaining natural ecosystems and the large wild animals they contain, while bringing major social and economic value to local communities and national governments.

Animals
5
Save Giraffes Now

We save giraffes through conservation in their natural habitats across 10 african countries.

Animals
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
The International Rhino Foundation

The international rhino foundation (irf) ensures the survival of rhinos through strategic partnerships, targeted protection, and scientifically sound interventions.

Animals
8
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
9
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
10
Wild Africa

Wild africa fund is dedicated to raising awareness and promoting efforts that preserve africa's natural beauty and wildlife, as well as the communities that rely on it.

Animals
11
Frankfurt Zoological Society - Us Inc

Fzs-us's main purpose is the conservation of wilderness and biodiversity worldwide. fzs-us also seeks to enhance the general public's understanding of the importance of wildlife conservation and the appreciation of nature's diversity on…

Animals
12
Born Free Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Charities Aid Foundation America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REWILD — $812,461 · AnimalsREWILDSAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC — $30,000 · Animals+2 more — $35,000 · AnimalsCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $38,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE PEACE PARKS INC — $15,475 · InternationalGIRAFFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION USA — $10,000 · InternationalDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc — $10,000 · Other
Animals$877,461Philanthropy$38,000International$25,475Other$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREWILD — $812,461 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $38,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC — $30,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PEACE PARKS INC — $15,475 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRAFFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION USA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wildarkorg Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Giraffe Conservation Foundation Usa2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wildarkorg Inc?

Find your warmest path to Wildarkorg Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph