Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wild Earth Compass Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$300
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Environment$5kAnimals$3kPhilanthropy$1kEducation$1kFood & Nutrition$50
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
3
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Southern Wisconsin Bird Alliance$300
Peninsula Open Space Trust$300
New England Aquarium Corp$300
Tahoe Donner Land Trust$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%New England Aquarium Corp: $500 → 16%Peninsula Open Space Trust: $1k → 8%Chicuchas Wasi: $1k → 9%Tahoe Donner Land Trust: $300 → 11%San Dieguito River Valley Conservan: $500 → 11%Badgerland Bird Alliance: $500 → 10%Benevolent giving 1000: $1k → 10%New England Aquarium Corp: $500 → 16%Peninsula Open Space Trust: $1k → 8%Southern Wisconsin Bird Alliance: $500 → 10%New England Aquarium Corp: $300 → 16%Peninsula Open Space Trust: $1k → 8%Southern Wisconsin Bird Alliance: $300 → 10%Peninsula Open Space Trust: $300 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5k · 3 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$5k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-16%
+49%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +106%
  • NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1k · revenue -16%
  • SW
    SOUTHERN WISCONSIN BIRD ALLIANCE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $800 · revenue -81%

Funded once

  • CW
    CHICUCHAS WASIgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +49%
  • BG
    Benevolent giving 1000
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • BB
    Badgerland Bird Alliance
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $3,300 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUSTSOUTHERN WISCONSIN BIRD ALLIANCE INC: $800 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN WISCONSIN BIRD ALLIANCE INCSAVE OSWIT CANYON INC: $500 · EnvironmentSAVE OSWIT CANYON INCCHICUCHAS WASI: $1,000 · OtherCHICUCHAS WASIBenevolent giving 1000: $1,000 · OtherBenevolent giving 1000Badgerland Bird Alliance: $500 · OtherBadgerland Bird AllianceSan Dieguito River Valley Conservan: $500 · OtherSan Dieguito River Valley ConservanTahoe Donner Land Trust: $300 · OtherTahoe Donner Land Trust+1 more: $50 · OtherNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $1,300 · AnimalsNEW ENGLAND AQU…
Environment$4,600Other$3,350Animals$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $3,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICUCHAS WASI: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHERN WISCONSIN BIRD ALLIANCE INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE OSWIT CANYON INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICUCHAS WASI ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN WISCONSIN BIRD ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OSWIT CANYON INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wild Earth Compass Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wild Earth Compass Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wild Earth Compass’ filings →

More from the funding graph