Skip to content

· Public charity

Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

$22M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$122MEducation$19MHuman Services$9.9M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
  • $250k+5 grants · $22M
$1,866,647
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER$11,896,529
COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK$5,405,835
CHILD STUDY CENTER$2,439,877
COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM$1,866,647
COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER-PROSPER$733,518
COOK CHILDREN'S HOME HEALTH$20,738
JEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILD STUDY CENTER: $1.9M → 11%CHILD STUDY CENTER: $1.3M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $22.3M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $17.7M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $13.9M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $11.9M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $11.6M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $11.1M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $9.6M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8.1M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $7.4M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $5.9M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $5.4M → 11%CHILD STUDY CENTER: $4.8M → 11%CHILD STUDY CENTER: $4.6M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $4.1M → 11%CHILD STUDY CENTER: $3.2M → 11%CHILD STUDY CENTER: $2.4M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $2.4M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $2.3M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $2.0M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $1.9M → 11%CHILD STUDY CENTER: $1.8M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $1.8M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $1.7M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $1.7M → 11%CHILD STUDY CENTER: $1.5M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $1.3M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $1.2M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $1.2M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $1.0M → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $992k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $807k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $783k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER-PROSPER: $734k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $566k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER-PROSPER: $143k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER-PROSPER: $105k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HOME HEALTH: $31k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HOME HEALTH: $29k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HOME HEALTH: $29k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER-PROSPER: $24k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH PLAN: $23k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HOME HEALTH: $21k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HOME HEALTH: $18k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HOME HEALTH: $18k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HOME HEALTH: $17k → 11%COOK CHILDREN'S HOME HEALTH: $16k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173M · 6 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +123% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$173M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+123%
+29%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Cook Children's Medical Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $114M · revenue +123%
  • CC
    Cook Children's Health Care System
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +188%
  • CS
    Child Study Center
    8× · 2018–2025 · $22M · revenue +43% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

  • CC
    Cook Children's Health Plangraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $23k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cook Children's Medical Center: $113,768,291 · HealthCook Children's Medical CenterCook Children's Health Care System: $21,618,803 · HealthCook Children's Health Care System+4 more: $1,213,896 · HealthChild Study Center: $21,501,070 · EducationChild Study Ce…COOK CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN NETWORK: $15,300,401 · OtherCOOK CHILD…
Health$136,600,990Education$21,501,070Other$15,300,401

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCook Children's Medical Center: $113,768,291 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetCook Children's Health Care System: $21,618,803 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetChild Study Center: $21,501,070 over 8y, 51% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center - Prosper: $1,005,652 over 4y, 95% of budgetCook Children's Home Health: $179,744 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCook Children's Health Plan: $22,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cook Children's Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Cook Children's Health Care System ↗
  • Who funds Child Study Center ↗
  • Who funds Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper ↗
  • Who funds Cook Children's Home Health ↗
  • Who funds Cook Children's Health Plan ↗
  • Who funds JEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wi Cook Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wi Cook Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wi Cook’s filings →

    More from the funding graph