Skip to content
White Dpc Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

White Dpc Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$260kHuman Services$85kFood & Nutrition$58kEducation$38kYouth Development$10kReligion$8k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,176
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP$3,176
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103k · 3 repeat orgs$356k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$103k
$356k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+121%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $45k · revenue +17%
  • CO
    CARITAS OF PORT CHESTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $35k · revenue +28%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP
    3× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • HR
    HEALTH RESEARCH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -31%
  • SL
    Springfield Library Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $33k · revenue +34%
  • PC
    PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +121%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Cares Inc

Our mission is to bring together all available resources for the benefit of the hungry on Long Island, and provide to the best of our ability for the humanitarian needs of our community. We provide food when and where its needed, sponsor…

Human Services
2
Sloatsburg Food Pantry Inc Dba Community Food Pantry

The focus and main program of the Sloatsburg Food Pantry is to provide supplemental food to those in need within the Suffern Central School District (Sloatsburg, Hillburn, Suffern, Montebello, and parts of Airmont) and Tuxedo, NY. We are a…

Food & Nutrition
3
Croton-Cortlandt Food Pantry

Croton Cortlandt Food Pantry's primary mission is to provide food assistance to families and individuals who are food insecure and have difficulty meeting their basic nutritional needs on their own. The pantry also provides diapers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Health and Welfare Council of Long Island Inc

Serve the most vulnerable on li by convening and supporting agencies that serve them

Health
5
Wilton Food Pantry

To provide those in need with emergency food by working together with community members, leaders, and local businesses and organizations to gather, store, and distribute goods; to offer compassionate help as we respect the dignity of each…

Food & Nutrition
6
Montauk Food Pantry

To collect and distribute food and provide economic assistance to needy families in the suffolk county and surrounding area. encourage awareness of the plight of the needy.

Food & Nutrition
7
Sandwich Food Pantry Inc

The sandwich food pantry is a non-profit, totally volunteer organization serving residents of sandwich since 1983. the pantry's goal is to help residents through difficult times by providing supplemental food, advice and directions to…

Human Services
8
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
9
Outer Cape Health Services Inc

Outer cape health services, inc.'s mission is to provide a full range of healthcare and supportive social services that promote the health and well-being of all who live in or visit the ten outermost towns of cape cod.

Health
10
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
11
Ossining Food Pantry

Feeding the hungry and providing food assistance to needy families.

Human Services
12
Open Pantry Community Services Inc

To run programs that provide meaningful services for those who are homeless or disadvantaged in the greater springfield, massachusetts area to help them become empowered to improve their quality of life.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Caritas of Port Chester Inc; the most unlike its peers is Health Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTH RESEARCH INC: $250,000 · HealthHEALTH RESEARCH INCSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FA…PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CAR…CARITAS OF PORT CHESTER INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionCARITAS OF POR…THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP: $23,176 · Food & NutritionTHE FAMILY PAN…DON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,000 · OtherDON BOSCO …RYE YOUTH COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · OtherRYE YOUTH …CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION: $7,500 · OtherCHURCH OF …THE SHARING SHELF INC: $5,000 · OtherTHE SHARIN…FRIENDS OF THE RYE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF…Springfield Library Foundation Inc: $33,334 · EducationTHE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Health$250,000Human Services$65,000Food & Nutrition$58,176Other$42,500Education$33,334Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARITAS OF PORT CHESTER INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSpringfield Library Foundation Inc: $33,334 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetTHE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP: $23,176 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRYE YOUTH COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetTHE SHARING SHELF INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization White Dpc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from White Dpc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on White Dpc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home