Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Whitaker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$3.9MRecreation & Sports$2.2MReligion$1.0MHuman Services$795kYouth Development$155kCrime & Legal$90kHousing & Shelter$61kAnimals$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $560k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$50,192
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL NORTHWEST$1,017,250
NEW LIFE RANCH$250,000
BARNABAS FOUNDATION$204,160
CIRCLE OF LIFE$195,905
THE CALL IN CRAWFORD & SEBASTIAN COUNTIES$110,000
RIVER VALLEY FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$50,192
COMPASSION MINISTRIES LTD DBA COMPASSION HOUSE$40,548
HOME FOR DINNER$36,421
SAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC$25,000
FISHING FOR THE FIGHT$10,000
DDX3X FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $466k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%SAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 19%HOME FOR DINNER: $36k → 8%NWA CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $75k → 8%NWA CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $75k → 8%NWA CHILDRENS SHELTER: $75k → 8%NWA CHILDRENS SHELTER: $75k → 8%NWA CHILDRENS SHELTER: $75k → 8%NWA CHILDRENS SHELTER: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 24% of Whitaker Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in AR; read by stated purpose it is 84% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Whitaker Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.4M · 17 repeat orgs$649k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$7.4M
$287k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+7%

Still filing today

59%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $362k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $600k · revenue +67%
  • NA
    NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $400k · revenue +76%
  • AB
    ARKANSAS BAPTIST ASSEMBLY INC D/B/A CAMP SILOAM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $325k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TEEN ACTION & SUPPORT CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue -51%
  • CM
    COMPASSION MINISTRIES COMPASSION HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $46k
  • RF
    RETRIEVING FREEDOM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $31k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
2
Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc

The organization provides a therapeutic shelter and care for homeless and/or abused children.

Housing & Shelter
3
Arkansas Hospice Inc

To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…

Human Services
4
Disability Rights Arkansas Inc

To vigorously advocate for and enforce the legal rights of people with disabilities in arkansas.

Civil Rights
5
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
6
Foundation of the Arkansas Sports Hall of Fame

To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history

Arts & Culture
7
Arkansas Hospice Foundation Inc

Arkansas hospice foundation is a non-profit, charitable 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to raise public awareness and financial support for arkansas hospice and related organization's programs and services, and to help donors meet…

Health
8
Arkansas Baptist Children's Home & Family Ministries

We build, strengthen and restore arkansas families for god's glory.

Human Services
9
Easterseals Arkansas

To provide exceptional services to ensure that all people with disabilities have equal opportunities to live, learn, work, and play in their communities.

Health
10
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health
11
Habitat for Humanity Pope County Ar

Seeking to put gods love in action by bringing people together to build homes for those in need

12
Arkansas Health Care Association

Arkansas health care association was organized for the following purposes: (a) to maintain high standard of quality care and administration of nursing homes and similar health care facilities, (b) to create greater opportunities for the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Advocacy Center of Benton County and the most unlike its peers is Home for Dinner Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr14%40%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr19%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr14%65%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr19%11%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
15%
2,092/14,058

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL NORTHWEST — $2,026,096 · OtherARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL NORTHWESTARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL NORTHW — $1,001,651 · OtherARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL NORTHWNEW LIFE RANCH INC — $250,000 · OtherNEW LIFE RANCH INCTHE CALL IN CRAWFORD & SEBASTIAN COUNTIES — $211,706 · OtherTHE TEEN ACTION & SUPPORT CENTER — $150,000 · Other+14 more — $456,740 · Other+14 moreArkansas Athletes Outreach — $1,517,631 · ReligionArkansas Athletes OutreachBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC — $444,816 · ReligionBARNABAS FOUNDATION INCARKANSAS BAPTIST ASSEMBLY INC D/B/A CAMP SILOAM — $324,620 · ReligionARKANSAS BAPTIST ASSEMBLY INC D…RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 · EducationCircle of Life — $396,740 · PhilanthropyEXCELLERATE FOUNDATION — $80,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC — $400,029 · Human ServicesHOME FOR DINNER INCORPORATED — $36,421 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesMAYO CLINIC — $250,000 · HealthDDX3X FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthFISHING FOR THE FIGHT — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF BENTON COUNTY — $90,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$4,096,193Religion$2,287,067Education$600,000Philanthropy$476,740Human Services$466,450Health$292,000Crime & Legal$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetArkansas Athletes Outreach — $1,517,631 over 5y, 24% of budgetRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC — $444,816 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC — $400,029 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCircle of Life — $396,740 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetARKANSAS BAPTIST ASSEMBLY INC D/B/A CAMP SILOAM — $324,620 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEEN ACTION & SUPPORT CENTER — $150,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF BENTON COUNTY — $90,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetEXCELLERATE FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetRETRIEVING FREEDOM INC — $30,820 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDDX3X FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetHORSES FOR HEALING INC — $26,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetSAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFISHING FOR THE FIGHT — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetDANA'S HOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWELCOMEHEALTH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFAULKNER COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR30.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Wal-Mart Foundation · Alice L Walton Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · The Schmieding Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · McKinney C & a Charitable Trust · Synchrony Foundation · Glass Family Foundation · Four1 Foundation · George H Dunklin Jr Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Whitaker Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Whitaker Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Whitaker Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph