Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

West Virginia · Public charity

Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation

To conserve, interpret, and promote the wheeling national heritage area and achieve economic development in the historic downtown/riverfront area, and to promote the education and general welfare of the people.

$21k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$21,250
Largest grant, FY2023
$21,250
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2022 to FY2023
Total assets, FY2023
$6.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20231$21k0%
FY20221$20kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Community Improvement$42k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2023.

VARIOUS PARTNERSHIP GRANTS$21,250

Compare Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation with peer funders

About Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation

How much does Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation give?
Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation reported 1 grants totaling $21,250 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2023, its largest causes are Community Improvement (100%).
Does Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation based?
Wheeling National Heritage Area Corporation is based in WV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $22k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wheeling National Heritage Area’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home