Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wheelhouse Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$224kReligion$89kHuman Services$88kEducation$30kRecreation & Sports$10kPublic Benefit$10kAnimals$5kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION$35,800
IONA UNIVERSITY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$13,750
THE CENTER FOR HOPE$10,000
THE PATRIOT FUND$10,000
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$5,000
SEWICKLEY HOUNDS FOUNDATION$5,000
YMCA$2,500
PITTSBURGH LUNG CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000
KIDS VOICE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA: $3k → 11%YMCA: $2k → 11%YMCA: $2k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $103k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $45k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $36k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$359k · 5 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$359k
$42k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LO
    LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $224k · revenue -3%
  • TM
    THE MISSION CO
    3× · 2021–2023 · $81k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • HC
    HILL CITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • AM
    AM MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alvernia University

Alvernia university is a catholic comprehensive university with a liberal arts foundation founded by the bernardine franciscan sisters in 1958. see continuation on schedule o.

—
2
Desales University

Desales is a catholic, salesian university that inspires transformative learning through the liberal arts and professional studies by energizing students to be who they are and be that well.

Education
3
Saint Francis University

As the oldest franciscan institution of higher learning in the united states, saint francis university draws inspiration from our catholic tradition and expresses the lived example of saint francis of assissi in the modern world. continued…

Education
4
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
5
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
6
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
7
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
8
Chatham University

Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…

Education
9
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
10
Shady Side Academy

Shady side academy offers an exceptional pre-k through twelfth grade academic and balanced educational experience by challenging each student to realize his or her potential in a stimulating and nurturing environment.

Education
11
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
12
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Shoulders Fund; the most unlike its peers is Patriot Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $223,795 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC+1 more: $6,500 · Human ServicesTHE MISSION CO: $81,150 · OtherTHE MISSION COHILL CITY CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherHILL CITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $24,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAMPUS CRUSADE: $23,500 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE+4 more: $7,286 · OtherIONA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationBig Shoulders Fund: $5,000 · EducationPATRIOT FUND INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR HOPE: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSEWICKLEY HOUNDS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · AnimalsPITTSBURGH LUNG CANCER CURE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthKIDSVOICE: $500 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$230,295Other$171,436Education$30,000Philanthropy$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Animals$5,000Health$1,000Crime & Legal$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $223,795 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOT FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEWICKLEY HOUNDS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 79% of budgetPITTSBURGH LUNG CANCER CURE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKIDSVOICE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds IONA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PATRIOT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE ROSES ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds SEWICKLEY HOUNDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH LUNG CANCER CURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDSVOICE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wheelhouse Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wheelhouse Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wheelhouse Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph