· Public charity
Western Montana Area VI Agency on Aging Inc
The older American act intends that the area agency on aging shall be the leader relative to all aging issuers on behalf of all older persons in the planning and service area.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of WESTERN MONTANA AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $168k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $850k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SANDERS COUNTY COA | $215,157 |
| POLSON SENIOR CITIZENS INC | $150,396 |
| SENIOR CITIZENS OF LINCOLN CO | $128,464 |
| KOOTENAI SENIOR CITIZENS | $105,264 |
| MISSION VALLEY SENIOR CITIZEN | $73,511 |
| TOBACCO VALLEY SENIOR CITIZEN | $66,181 |
| CS & K TRIBES | $55,505 |
| ST IGNATIUS SENIOR CENTER | $55,383 |
| CHARLO MOIESE SENIOR CITIZENS | $42,757 |
| SUPERIOR SENIOR CENTER | $35,749 |
| ARLEE SENIOR CITIZENS INC | $32,828 |
| ALBERTON SENIOR CENTER | $29,553 |
| ST REGIS SENIOR CENTER | $27,306 |
| LIBBY VFW | $5,363 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSANDERS CO COUNCIL ON AGING9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +91% · 31% of their budget
- PSPOLSON SENIOR CITIZENS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $655k · revenue +174% · 46% of their budget
- KSKOOTENAI SENIOR CITIZENS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $591k · revenue +64% · 45% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
- LCLINCOLN COUNTY COMMISSIONERSone grant, 2023 · $10k
- TCTROY COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Adults day care
Services for Senior Citizens
Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes
To offer a nutrition program for older persons.
Providing care and services for senior citizens.
Providing meals for aged
Senior Center facility for the local Meals on Wheels production.
Serving senior citizens in area
To Provide Services, Energy, Assistance, and Meals on Wheels to local Seniors and other low income individuals in need.
We serve the senior citizens of Southern Bingham County, and the Citizens of Aberdeen, Idaho Meals on Wheels and congregate meals onsite.
We help between 10 and 20 Senior Citizens on a weekly basis.
Provide home delivered meals and transportation services free of charge
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kootenai Senior Citizens Inc and the most unlike its peers is Polson Senior Citizens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SANDERS CO COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF LINCOLN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds POLSON SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds KOOTENAI SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds Tobacco Valley Senior Citizens AssocInc ↗
- Who funds MISSION VALLEY SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST IGNATIUS SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALBERTON SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Trout Creek Senior Citizens Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Western Montana Area VI Agency on Aging Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Western Montana Area VI Agency on Aging Inc?
Find your warmest path to Western Montana Area VI Agency on Aging Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.