Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Montana · Public charity

Western Health Screening

To provide health screening services to over 30,000 individuals located in utah, montana, wyoming, colorado, nebraska,and south dakota operating on a non profit basis.

$313k
Granted FY2020
2
Itemized grants FY2020
2
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2020
$295k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2020
$289,673
Largest grant, FY2020
$289,673
States reached, FY2020
2

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Poochz B & B Bell$289,6731n/a
Saving Grace$5,00010%

Compare Western Health Screening with peer funders

About Western Health Screening

How much does Western Health Screening give?
Western Health Screening reported 2 itemized grants totaling $294,673, out of $313,244 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2020 IRS filing.
What does Western Health Screening fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2020, its largest causes are Animals (98%), Human Services (2%).
Who are Western Health Screening's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2020: Poochz B & B Bell ($290k), Saving Grace ($5k).
Where is Western Health Screening based?
Western Health Screening is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home