Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Westcott Test Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$570kHealth$99kEnvironment$95kFood & Nutrition$89kAnimals$49kCrime & Legal$16kReligion$12k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$7,019
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY$51,685
UNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN$13,400
CR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$13,400
ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$13,400
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$7,019
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$7,019
PERMIAN BASIN FOOD BANK DBA$7,019
HUMANE SOCIETY OF ODESSA$7,019
MEALS ON WHEELS OF ODESSA INC$5,743
AURORA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,914
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY: $56k → 16%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $8k → 12%CR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $15k → 12%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8k → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY: $52k → 16%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $7k → 12%CR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $13k → 12%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7k → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY: $49k → 16%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $7k → 12%CR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $13k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY: $47k → 16%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $6k → 12%CR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $12k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY: $44k → 16%CR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $11k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY: $44k → 16%CR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $11k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY: $42k → 16%CR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $11k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY: $42k → 16%CR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $11k → 12%PERMIAN BASIN FOOD BANK DBA: $8k → 16%PERMIAN BASIN FOOD BANK DBA: $7k → 16%PERMIAN BASIN FOOD BANK DBA: $7k → 16%PERMIAN BASIN FOOD BANK DBA: $6k → 16%ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12k → 16%ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11k → 16%ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11k → 16%ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11k → 16%ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11k → 16%UNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN: $14k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ODESSA: $8k → 16%UNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN: $13k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ODESSA: $7k → 16%UNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN: $13k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ODESSA: $7k → 16%UNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN: $12k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ODESSA: $6k → 16%UNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN: $11k → 16%UNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN: $11k → 16%UNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN: $11k → 16%UNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN: $11k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$929k · 12 repeat orgs$697 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$929k
$697

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $96k · revenue +206%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF ODESSA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +350%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN
    one grant, 2022 · $697

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARY — $376,712 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ECTOR CO LIBRARYCR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS — $96,074 · OtherCR DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARSUNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN — $95,377 · OtherUNIV TEXAS PERMIAN BASINPERMIAN BASIN FOOD BANK DBA — $49,300 · OtherPERMIAN BASIN FOOD BANK DBAMEALS ON WHEELS OF ODESSA INC — $39,946 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF ODESSA INC+4 more — $50,079 · Other+4 moreODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $96,074 · EducationODESSA COLL…American Heart Association Inc — $49,300 · HealthAmerican …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $27,800 · HealthAMERICAN …HUMANE SOCIETY OF ODESSA — $49,300 · Community Improvement
Other$707,488Education$96,074Health$77,100Community Improvement$49,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $96,074 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF ODESSA — $49,300 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $49,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ODESSA INC — $39,946 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $27,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF ODESSA
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ODESSA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Westcott Test Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph