Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weixelbaum a FBO Char 4947 Ir Tua

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$532
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$216kHealth$102kPhilanthropy$97kHuman Services$41kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$266
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$532
BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$266
SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION$266
STARR COMMONWEALTH$133
Individual grant recipient$133
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $41k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $133 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$413k · 9 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$413k
$2k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationReligionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $171k · revenue +18%
  • BS
    Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $82k · revenue +74%
  • CM
    Community Mercy Health Partners
    4× · 2019–2022 · $6k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM OF W OHIO
    one grant, 2018 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $171,412 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $50,953 · OtherIndividual grant recip…JEFFERSON MEDICAL COLLEGE — $34,300 · OtherJEFFERSON MEDICAL COLL…STARR COMMONWEALTH SCHOOLS — $10,000 · OtherSTARR COMMONWEALTH SCH…ADVOCATING RIGHT OF CITIZEN W MR — $5,250 · Other+1 more — $1,800 · OtherTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION — $96,934 · PhilanthropyTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUND…Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $81,669 · ReligionBon Secours Mercy …STARR COMMONWEALTH — $40,953 · Human ServicesSTARR COM…Community Mercy Health System — $12,500 · HealthCommunity Mercy Health Partners — $5,700 · Health
Education$171,412Other$102,303Philanthropy$96,934Religion$81,669Human Services$40,953Health$18,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $171,412 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION — $96,934 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $81,669 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTARR COMMONWEALTH — $40,953 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Mercy Health Partners — $5,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation
  • Who funds STARR COMMONWEALTH
  • Who funds Community Mercy Health Partners

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weixelbaum a FBO Char 4947 Ir Tua funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph