Skip to content
Wecare 365 Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Wecare 365 Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$13kHealth$9kArts & Culture$3kReligion$3kYouth Development$2kFood & Nutrition$2kCommunity Improvement$2kEmployment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$42k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOE MALAIKA FOUNDATION$3,000
LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$2,100
MERRIMACK VALLEY WELCOME CENTER$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,750
CAPE VERDEAN ASSOCIATION OF BROCKTON$1,500
SERVANT OF HOPE FOOD PANTRY$1,000
WHITTIER STREET HEALTH CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$636
Individual grant recipient$500
YMCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS$500
MADISON PARK CAPEVERDEAN FAMILY & FRIENDS$500
Individual grant recipient$355
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$250
SOMEBODY CARES FOOD PANTRY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOUNDATION OF FAITH HEBREWS 111: $1k → 7%CAPE VERDEAN ASSOCIATION OF BROCKTON: $2k → 8%LIEM NGUYEN: $1k → 8%SOMEBODY CARES FOOD PANTRY: $250 → 10%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $4k → 11%SER-JOB FOR PROGRESS INC: $1k → 11%KATARINA FORTES: $2k → 16%RUNWAY FOR MOM: $2k → 14%ST EDITH STEIN PARISH: $1k → 8%JOE MALAIKA FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%ASPERGER WORKS-THE GRAY HOUSE: $1k → 10%YMCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS: $500 → 11%WHITTIER STREET HEALTH CENTER: $1k → 16%SERVANT OF HOPE FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 8%MERRIMACK VALLEY WELCOME CENTER: $2k → 10%TARA MCADOO: $600 → 16%JOHN DOE: $805 → 8%LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $2k → 10%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $500 → 16%AMIGOS DE SEMINARISTAS: $500 → 8%CABO VERDEAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 16%DALILA SPINOLA: $349 → 8%ISAURA CARDOSO: $223 → 16%ALBERT HAMPTON: $300 → 8%JAIRO R VERAS LOPEZ: $768 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $3,508 · OtherMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATIONJOE MALAIKA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · OtherJOE MALAIKA FOUNDATION INCMERRIMACK VALLEY WELCOME CENTER: $2,000 · OtherMERRIMACK VALLEY WELCOME CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $1,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAPE VERDEAN ASSOCIATION OF BROCKTON: $1,500 · OtherCAPE VERDEAN ASSOCIATION OF BROCKTONIndividual grant recipient: $1,336 · OtherST EDITH STEIN PARISH: $1,000 · OtherSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC: $1,000 · OtherSERVANTS OF HOPE FOOD PANTRY: $1,000 · OtherASPERGER WORKS-THE GRAY HOUSE: $1,000 · OtherFOUNDATION OF FAITH HEBREWS 111: $1,000 · Other+20 more: $8,499 · Other+20 moreCABO VERDEAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 · HealthCABO VERDEAN …Whittier Street Health Center Committee Inc: $1,000 · HealthWhittier Stre…LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $2,100 · Youth Development
Other$28,093Health$4,000Youth Development$2,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCABO VERDEAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWhittier Street Health Center Committee Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CABO VERDEAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Whittier Street Health Center Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds SER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wecare 365 Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wecare 365 Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wecare 365’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home