Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walter and Virginia Hager Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$195k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Religion$128kHealth$55kEducation$36kArts & Culture$22kYouth Development$22kHuman Services$19kCommunity Improvement$17kPublic Benefit$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $143k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$30,000
MOBRIDGE REGION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
MOBRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT$15,000
IMPERIAL METHODIST CHURCH$12,000
MOBRIDGE RODEO FOUNDATION$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
KLEIN MUSEUM$12,000
VICTORY CENTER BIBLE CONFERENCE$10,000
MOBRIDGE YOUTH ORGANIZATION$9,000
MOBRIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$9,000
MOBRIDGE PINK LADIES$9,000
NEW HOPE FOUNDATION$9,000
MOBRIDGE PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATIO$6,000
MOBRIDGE MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 31%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 31%IMPERIAL METHODIST CHURCH: $12k → 10%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50k → 25%VICTORY CENTER BIBLE CONFERENCE: $10k → 29%CITY OF MOBRIDGE: $40k → 25%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $30k → 25%MOBRIDGE REGION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 25%MOBRIDGE REGION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 25%MOBRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15k → 25%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15k → 25%CITY OF MOBRIDGE: $15k → 25%MOBRIDGE RODEO FOUNDATION: $12k → 25%MOBRIDGE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $12k → 25%KLEIN MUSEUM: $12k → 25%MOBRIDGE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 25%KLEIN MUSEUM: $10k → 25%MOBRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10k → 25%NEW HOPE FOUNDATION: $9k → 25%MOBRIDGE YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $9k → 25%MOBRIDGE PINK LADIES: $9k → 25%MOBRIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $9k → 25%MOBRIDGE YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $8k → 25%MOBRIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $8k → 25%MOBRIDGE PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATIO: $6k → 25%MOBRIDGE MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION: $6k → 25%MOBRIDGE PINK LADIES: $5k → 25%MOBRIDGE MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION: $5k → 25%NEW HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 25%MOBRIDGE PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATIO: $5k → 25%MOBRIDGE REGION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 25%NEW HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 25%AMERICAN LEGION BOYS STATE CORP: $3k → 25%PARENTS FOR POSITIVE CHANGES: $1k → 25%PARENTS FOR POSITIVE CHANGES: $1k → 25%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$364k · 13 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$364k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

15%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $95k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $55k
  • MR
    MOBRIDGE REGION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k

Funded once

  • MR
    MOBRIDGE RODEO FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $12k · revenue 0%
  • IM
    IMPERIAL METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2025 · $12k
  • VC
    VICTORY CENTER BIBLE CONFERENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
1/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $95,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMOBRIDGE REGION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherMOBRIDGE REGION HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONMOBRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25,000 · OtherMOBRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKLEIN MUSEUM: $22,000 · OtherKLEIN MUSEUMNEW HOPE FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherNEW HOPE FOUNDATIONMOBRIDGE PINK LADIES: $14,000 · OtherIMPERIAL METHODIST CHURCH: $12,000 · Other+4 more: $27,000 · Other+4 moreMOBRIDGE YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $16,500 · Youth DevelopmentMOBRIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $16,500 · Community ImprovementMOBRIDGE RODEO FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsVICTORY CENTER BIBLE CONFERENCE: $10,000 · Religion
Other$346,000Youth Development$16,500Community Improvement$16,500Recreation & Sports$12,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOBRIDGE YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $16,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetMOBRIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $16,500 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetMOBRIDGE RODEO FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAmerican Legion Boys State: $3,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOBRIDGE YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds MOBRIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
  • Who funds MOBRIDGE RODEO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTORY CENTER BIBLE CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds American Legion Boys State ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter and Virginia Hager Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter and Virginia Hager Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Walter and Virginia Hager’s filings →

    More from the funding graph