Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walter & Opal Heide Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$229kHealth$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kHuman Services$7kCommunity Improvement$7k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$790
Median grant
5
States reached
$487k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,290
HOSPICE SERVICES INC$1,581
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$790
AMERICAN RED CROSS$790
RED BIRD MISSION$790
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$790
THE SALVATION ARMY$790
KANSAS MASONIC FOUNDATION$790
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $790) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $790 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$283k · 10 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$283k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
0%

Still filing today

30%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $224k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2017–2024 · $13k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k

Funded once

  • HS
    HOSPICE SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2025 · $2k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2025 · $790 · revenue 0%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2025 · $790 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $223,789 · OtherUNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $12,710 · Other+7 more: $38,326 · Other+7 moreKANSAS MASONIC FOUNDATION INC: $7,147 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,293 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $790 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $790 · Human Services
Other$274,825Health$10,230Human Services$790

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKANSAS MASONIC FOUNDATION INC: $7,147 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRED BIRD MISSION INC: $7,147 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,293 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $790 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KANSAS MASONIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RED BIRD MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter & Opal Heide Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter & Opal Heide Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walter & Opal Heide Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph