Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wade Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$1.5MHealth$584kFood & Nutrition$290kPhilanthropy$290kEducation$145kInternational$145kHuman Services$7k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$12,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH$125,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT$25,000
YAD EZRA INC$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$12,500
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$12,500
HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC$12,500
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$12,500
JERUSALEM ORPHAN HOME INC$12,500
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FDN$12,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 19% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JERUSALEM ORPHAN HOME INC: $21k → 20%YAD EZRA INC: $42k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FDN: $21k → 21%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $19k → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $15k → 13%HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $21k → 7%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $15k → 9%JERUSALEM ORPHAN HOME INC: $21k → 20%YAD EZRA INC: $42k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FDN: $21k → 21%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $14k → 13%HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $21k → 7%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $14k → 9%JERUSALEM ORPHAN HOME INC: $19k → 20%YAD EZRA INC: $39k → 8%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $21k → 21%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $14k → 13%HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $19k → 7%JERUSALEM ORPHAN HOME INC: $17k → 20%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $21k → 21%HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $17k → 7%JERUSALEM ORPHAN HOME INC: $15k → 20%YAD EZRA INC: $33k → 8%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $19k → 21%HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $15k → 7%JERUSALEM ORPHAN HOME INC: $14k → 20%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FDN: $19k → 21%HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $14k → 7%YAD EZRA INC: $30k → 8%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 21%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FDN: $17k → 21%YAD EZRA INC: $27k → 8%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 21%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FDN: $15k → 21%YAD EZRA INC: $27k → 8%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 21%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FDN: $14k → 21%YAD EZRA INC: $25k → 8%YAD EZRA INC: $25k → 8%YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $210k → 8%YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $210k → 8%YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $193k → 8%YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $165k → 8%YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $125k → 8%YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $125k → 8%YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $150k → 8%YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $137k → 8%YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $137k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$2.6M
$0

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YE
    YAD EZRA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +42%
  • JO
    Jerusalem Orphan Home Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +99%
  • HN
    HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +50%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Zichron Avrohom Yosef
    Philanthropy
    2
    American Friends of Jewish Hospitals and Education Centers of Brazil Inc
    Philanthropy
    3
    The Jewish Fund

    The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

    Philanthropy
    4
    Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

    Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

    Health
    5
    Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
    Philanthropy
    6
    The Jerusalem Connection
    7
    Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts Inc

    To care for the frail, elderly and infirmed according to jewish traditions.

    Human Services
    8
    Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

    We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

    Housing & Shelter
    9
    Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

    Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

    Community Improvement
    10
    National Jewish Health

    National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

    Health
    11
    Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

    The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

    Health
    12
    Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

    The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

    Health

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit and the most unlike its peers is Jerusalem Orphan Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    5/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH — $1,451,625 · OtherYESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAHYAD EZRA — $290,325 · OtherYAD EZRAWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $145,163 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY+2 more — $65,500 · OtherAmerican Diabetes Association — $148,913 · HealthAmerican Diabetes As…HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC — $145,163 · HealthHOLY NAME MEDICAL CE…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $145,163 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $86,663 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCI…JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $290,325 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDE…Jerusalem Orphan Home Inc — $145,163 · International
    Other$1,952,613Health$525,902Philanthropy$290,325International$145,163

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYAD EZRA — $290,325 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $290,325 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $148,913 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJerusalem Orphan Home Inc — $145,163 over 9y, 10% of budgetHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC — $145,163 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $145,163 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $86,663 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOME AND AGING SERVICES — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds YAD EZRA
    • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT
    • Who funds American Diabetes Association
    • Who funds Jerusalem Orphan Home Inc
    • Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION
    • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    • Who funds JEWISH HOME AND AGING SERVICES

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Wade Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
    • Holy Name Medical Center Inc1% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph