Skip to content

Oregon · Public charity

Vote No on 104

Oppose state ballot measure

$645k
Granted FY2018
1
Itemized grants FY2018
1
Organizations funded FY2018
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2018
$575k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2018
$575,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$575,000
States reached, FY2018
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Defend Oregon$575,0001n/a

Compare Vote No on 104 with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vote No on 104?

Find your warmest path to Vote No on 104 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Vote No on 104

How much does Vote No on 104 give?
Vote No on 104 reported 1 itemized grants totaling $575,000, out of $645,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2018 IRS filing.
What does Vote No on 104 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2018, its largest causes are Public Benefit (100%).
Who are Vote No on 104's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2018: Defend Oregon ($575k).
Where is Vote No on 104 based?
Vote No on 104 is based in OR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph