Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Virginia B Gourdin Char Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$334kHealth$67kAnimals$33kReligion$33k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION$7,143
TRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FND INC$7,143
CHARLESTON SCHOOL OF LAW$7,143
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$4,000
FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,571
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$3,000
CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY$1,786
INTL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE$893
PEOPLE FOR THE ETH TRTMNT OF ANIMALS$893
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 15% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%INTL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $1k → 11%FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 12%CLEMSON UNIV FBO OLIVIA WIDEMAN: $6k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%PEOPLE FOR THE ETH TRTMNT OF ANIMALS: $893 → 19%INTL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $1k → 11%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION: $9k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%P E T A: $893 → 19%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 12%UNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA FBO GABRIELLE: $3k → 16%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 12%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 12%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 12%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 12%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 12%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%FIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 12%CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FBO MARY STUCKEY: $2k → 12%CHARLESTON SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATION: $9k → 12%CHARLESTON SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%CHARLESTON SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%CHARLESTON SCHOOL OF LAW: $7k → 12%CHARLESTON SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%CHARLESTON SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%CHARLESTON SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$315k · 11 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
37

Total granted

$315k
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+118%

Still filing today

55%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Charleston School of Law
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue ×254
  • MU
    MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +107%
  • CA
    CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMIN
    one grant, 2017 · $21k
  • SS
    SARAH SMITH CO CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • SM
    SARAH MILEY CO CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Clemson University Research Foundation

To generate research funding opportunities for clemson university to support research initiatives that advance university discoveries to create new products and services for public use and benefit.

Education
4
The South Carolina Historical Society

The schs mission is to expand, preserve, and make accessible our invaluable collection, and to encourage interest and pride in the rich history of our state.

Arts & Culture
5
Anderson University

The university is a comprehensive university affiliated with the south carolina baptist convention offering bachelors, masters, and doctorate degrees. located on approximately 398 acres in the upstate region of south carolina near the…

Education
6
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
7
Coastal Educational Foundation

To provide support to coastal carolina university through charitable donations received primarily from individual donors.

8
Central Piedmont Community College Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission is to generate private financial support to further the mission of central piedmont community college.

Education
9
The Carolina Trust
Philanthropy
10
Savannah College of Art and DesignInc

Scad prepares talented students for creative professions through engaged teaching and learning in a positively oriented university environment.

Education
11
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
12
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clemson University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is International Primate Protection League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA — $39,428 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINAFIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $33,283 · OtherFIRST SCOTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMIN — $21,428 · OtherCENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FND INC — $14,286 · OtherTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FND INCCLEMSON UNIVERSITY — $9,357 · Other+35 more — $123,785 · Other+35 moreCharleston School of Law — $66,574 · EducationCharleston School of LawTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $52,287 · EducationTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUND…CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,357 · EducationCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $5,357 · EducationMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $66,573 · HealthMEDICAL UNIVERSI…CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY — $16,645 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE — $8,323 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $4,465 · Animals
Other$241,567Education$129,575Health$66,573Animals$29,433

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCharleston School of Law — $66,574 over 9y, 12% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $66,573 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $52,287 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY — $16,645 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE — $8,323 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $5,357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $4,465 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Charleston School of Law
  • Who funds MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE
  • Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Virginia B Gourdin Char Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph