Skip to content

· Private foundation

Viole Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of Viole Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’20
7
’21
12
’22
10
’23
10
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$388kPhilanthropy$19kHealth$14kHousing & Shelter$13kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$4kInternational$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD$75,000
Keck School of Medicine$30,000
MARLBOROUGH FUND$5,000
CHILDRENS HOSP LA$2,500
LIBRARY FDN LA$2,500
PARENTS FOR CARPENTER$2,500
LA Mission$1,000
UNION RESCUE MISSION$1,000
ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
UNICEF USA$500
MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FDN$500
Individual grant recipient$500
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$500
The Salvation Army$500
UNITED WAY OF GREATER LA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 12%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%THE UNION RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%Union Rescue Mission: $1k → 14%Union Rescue Mission: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
CA
VA
MD
KS
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 46% of Viole Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Viole Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$81k · 17 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$81k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-1%

Still filing today

71%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +27%
  • PF
    PARENTS FOR CARPENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • UR
    UNION RESCUE MISSION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • SF
    Standford Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • LF
    LADMC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -53%
  • TL
    THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
3
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
6
Loma Linda University Children's Hospital Foundation

Our children's hospital foundation is dedicated to supporting loma linda university children's hospital's mission to bring whole-child healthcare to the region and beyond.

—
7
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

—
8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Los Angeles Organizing Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Games 2028

The organization aims to benefit the residents of the united states through the planning, promotion and staging of the xxxiv olympiad and the xviii paralympic games.

Recreation & Sports
11
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
12
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Parents for Carpenter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $85,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL: $30,000 · EducationMARLBOROUGH SCHOOLStandford Fund: $15,000 · OtherStandford F…MARLBOROUGH FUND: $5,000 · OtherMARLBOROUGH…ST VINCENTS MEALS ON WHEELS: $3,000 · OtherST VINCENTS…LIBRARY FDN LA: $2,500 · OtherTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $2,500 · OtherCarpenter Elementary School: $2,500 · OtherHabitat for Humanity: $2,000 · OtherSt Vincent Meals on Wheels: $2,000 · Other+14 more: $10,500 · Other+14 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $10,500 · HealthLADMC FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $2,000 · HealthPARENTS FOR CARPENTER INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsUNION RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Education$365,000Other$47,500Health$15,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Human Services$6,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS FOR CARPENTER INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLADMC FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS FOR CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds LADMC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Viole Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Viole Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Viole Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph