Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

North Carolina · Public charity

Vietnamese Nom Preservation Foundation Inc

Foundation is to increase access to the endangered, 1000-year heritage of writing in the chu nom script by developing computer tools for its digitization, its printing,study,bibliographic identification,preservation,and its internet exchange.

$52k
Granted FY2018
1
Itemized grants FY2018
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Vietnamese Nom Preservation Foundation Inc’s FY2018 grant dollars went to The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Itemized, FY2018
$30k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2018
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$30,000
States reached, FY2018
1

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2018.

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$30,000

Compare Vietnamese Nom Preservation Foundation Inc with peer funders

About Vietnamese Nom Preservation Foundation Inc

How much does Vietnamese Nom Preservation Foundation Inc give?
Vietnamese Nom Preservation Foundation Inc reported 1 itemized grants totaling $30,000, out of $52,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2018 IRS filing.
What does Vietnamese Nom Preservation Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Science & Tech (100%).
Where is Vietnamese Nom Preservation Foundation Inc based?
Vietnamese Nom Preservation Foundation Inc is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home