Skip to content
Vanguard (Ote) Consortium at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Vanguard (Ote) Consortium

Empowering farmers through regional partnerships that expand markets for American agricultural products, advancing long-term sustainability, and connecting nonprofit, for-profit, educational, and government partners.

$920k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Education$269kFood & Nutrition$206kAnimals$112kEnvironment$102kScience & Tech$89kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $253,918, the rows itemized in this filing. The $919,961 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $666,043 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $92k
$16,520
Median grant
1
States reached
$418k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALCORN STATE UNIV$92,067
MISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$32,075
WALTER JACKSON FAMILY FARMS LLC$26,009
ENVIRO-REMEDIATION EDUCATION SVS LLC$22,880
MONROE STREET ANIMAL CLINIC & BOARDING SERVICES$17,336
ROCK 22 FARMS$16,520
JJ&K FARMS LLC$8,450
BILLY JIMSON FARMS$8,400
AMERIMAC CHEMICAL CORP$8,351
GORDON CATTLE LLC$8,260
WAVERLY BEEF LLC$8,260
HAWKINS FARMS$5,310
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 23%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 23%WASHINGTON D FARMS L: $8k → 11%WAVERLY BEEF LLC: $8k → 22%SIMS FARMS LLC: $8k → 22%VON GORDON CATTLE CO LLC: $8k → 23%MUDDY RIVER DELTA: $8k → 23%JJ&K FARMS LLC: $8k → 27%OZELL WHITE PL 88 FARMS LLC: $6k → 31%MUDDY RIVER DELTA: $8k → 31%ALCORN STATE UNIV: $92k → 34%MISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $98k → 34%WALTER JACKSON FAMILY FARMS LLC: $77k → 35%WASHINGTON D FARMS L: $8k → 11%AMERIMAC CHEMICAL CORP: $81k → 23%JJ&K FARMS LLC: $8k → 27%ALCORN STATE UNIV: $47k → 34%MISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $32k → 34%WALTER JACKSON FAMILY FARMS LLC: $26k → 35%VON GORDON CATTLE LLC: $8k → 23%JJ&K FARMS LLC: $8k → 27%AMERIMAC CHEMICAL CORP: $8k → 23%BILLY JIMSON FARMS: $8k → 27%GORDON CATTLE LLC: $8k → 23%ROCK 22 FARMS: $17k → 23%ENVIRO-REMEDIATION EDUCATION SERVICES LLC: $71k → 23%MONROE STREET ANIMAL CLINIC & BOARDING SERVICES: $78k → 23%ENVIRO-REMEDIATION EDUCATION SVS LLC: $23k → 23%MONROE STREET ANIMAL CLINIC & BOARDING SERVICES: $17k → 23%HAWKINS FARMS: $5k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$684k · 8 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$684k
$64k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $139k
  • MV
    MISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $131k
  • WJ
    WALTER JACKSON FAMILY FARMS LLC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $103k

Funded once

  • JF
    JJ&K FARMS LLC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k
  • WD
    WASHINGTON D FARMS L
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • WD
    WASHINGTON D FARMS L
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2024–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2024 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY: $138,675 · OtherALCORN STATE UNIVERSITYMISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $130,508 · OtherMISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYWALTER JACKSON FAMILY FARMS LLC: $102,821 · OtherWALTER JACKSON FAMILY FARMS LLCMONROE STREET ANIMAL CLINIC: $95,513 · OtherMONROE STREET ANIMAL CLINICENVIRO-REMEDIATION EDUCATION SERVICES LLC: $93,935 · OtherENVIRO-REMEDIATION EDUCATION SERVICES LLCAMERIMAC CHEMICAL CORP: $89,463 · OtherAMERIMAC CHEMICAL CORP+14 more: $135,605 · Other+14 more
Other$786,520

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vanguard (Ote) Consortium’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home