Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vandeberg Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$83k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$70kEducation$31kHuman Services$31kHealth$15kInternational$5kYouth Development$4kPhilanthropy$3kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $62,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $82,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERU STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$20,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$14,000
MISSION CENTRAL$7,500
GRACE POINT INSTITUTION FOR RELATIONAL HEALTH$5,000
CHRIST SCHOOLS$3,000
UNITED WAY OF CARROLL IA$3,000
I'VE GOT A NAME$3,000
HARBOR MINISTRIES$2,500
HOPE CENTER UGANDA$2,000
AUBURN BACKPACK PROGRAM$2,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 6 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$68k
$64k

Still filing today

0%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Human ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $27k
  • LC
    LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD
    2× · 2022–2023 · $22k
  • CS
    CHRIST SCHOOLS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k

Funded once

  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC.
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CL
    CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • GP
    GRACE POINT INSTITUTION FOR RELATIONAL HE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC.: $25,000 · OtherLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC.LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD: $21,500 · OtherLUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNODCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $16,922 · OtherCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCHGRACE POINT INSTITUTION FOR RELATIONAL HE: $10,000 · OtherGRACE POINT INSTITUTION FOR RELATIONAL HECHRIST SCHOOLS: $5,500 · OtherGRACE POINT INSTITUTION FOR RELATIONAL HEALTH: $5,000 · OtherHARBOR MINISTRIES: $5,000 · OtherHOPE CENTER UGANDA: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $17,000 · Other+6 morePeru State College Foundation: $20,000 · EducationPeru State Co…IVE GOT A NAME: $3,000 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$137,922Education$20,000Human Services$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPeru State College Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIVE GOT A NAME: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Peru State College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds IVE GOT A NAME ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vandeberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Vandeberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $108k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vandeberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph