Skip to content
Van Gorden John H and Emma P-Crut at a glance

· Private foundation

Van Gorden John H and Emma P-Crut

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$280k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$741kArts & Culture$529kEducation$319kReligion$265kPhilanthropy$193kPublic Benefit$52kHuman Services$18k
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $126k
$13,992
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB$69,996
SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND$55,992
RETINA EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE$27,996
COUNCIL OF CHURCHES$27,996
HOUGHTON COLLEGE$27,996
COMMONWEALTH CHARITABLE MANAGEMENT$13,992
COMMUNITY CHEST$13,992
ROBERSON CENTER ART SCIENCE$13,992
DEMOLAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$13,992
DAVIS COLLEGE$6,996
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$6,996
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND: $71k → 8%RETINA EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $35k → 16%COMMONWEALTH CHARITABLE MANAGEMENT: $18k → 11%MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB: $89k → 16%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $35k → 19%COMMUNITY CHEST: $18k → 20%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND: $70k → 16%DEMOLAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $19k → 16%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND: $71k → 8%RETINA EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $35k → 16%COMMONWEALTH CHARITABLE MANAGEMENT: $18k → 11%MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB: $89k → 16%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $35k → 19%COMMUNITY CHEST: $18k → 20%DEMOLAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 16%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND: $71k → 8%RETINA EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $35k → 16%COMMONWEALTH CHARITABLE MANAGEMENT: $18k → 11%MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB: $89k → 16%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $35k → 19%COMMUNITY CHEST: $18k → 20%DEMOLAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 16%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND: $71k → 8%RETINA EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $35k → 16%COMMONWEALTH CHARITABLE MANAGEMENT: $18k → 11%MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB: $89k → 16%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $35k → 19%COMMUNITY CHEST: $18k → 20%DEMOLAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 16%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND: $71k → 8%RETINA EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $35k → 16%COMMONWEALTH CHARITABLE MANAGEMENT: $18k → 11%MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB: $89k → 16%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $35k → 19%DEMOLAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 16%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND: $56k → 8%RETINA EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $28k → 16%MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB: $87k → 16%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $28k → 19%MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB: $70k → 16%COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $35k → 20%COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $35k → 20%COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $35k → 20%COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $35k → 20%COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $35k → 20%COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $35k → 20%COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $28k → 20%ROBERSON CENTER ART & SCIENCE: $18k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 10 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$2.2M
$28k

Still filing today

30%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB
    7× · 2020–2026 · $599k
  • SR
    SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND
    7× · 2020–2026 · $480k
  • CO
    COUNCIL OF CHURCHES
    7× · 2020–2026 · $240k

Funded once

  • RC
    ROBERSON CENTER ART SCIENCE
    one grant, 2026 · $14k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHEST
    one grant, 2026 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LAB: $599,454 · OtherMASONIC MEDICAL RESCH LABSCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND: $479,558 · OtherSCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM ANDCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $239,779 · OtherCOUNCIL OF CHURCHESRETINA EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $239,779 · OtherRETINA EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTEDEMOLAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $121,358 · OtherDEMOLAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONROBERSON CENTER ART & SCIENCE: $105,891 · OtherROBERSON CENTER ART & SCIENCECOMMUNITY CHEST: $104,416 · Other+3 more: $87,926 · OtherHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $239,779 · EducationHOUGHTON UN…COMMONWEALTH CHARITABLE MANAGEMENT INC: $119,883 · PhilanthropyTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $59,205 · Public Benefit
Other$1,978,161Education$239,779Philanthropy$119,883Public Benefit$59,205

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $239,779 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH CHARITABLE MANAGEMENT INC: $119,883 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDAVIS COLLEGE: $59,942 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $59,205 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMONWEALTH CHARITABLE MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Van Gorden John H and Emma P-Crut funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Van Gorden John H and Emma P-Crut. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Van Gorden John H and Emma P-Crut’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home