Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Missouri · Public charity

Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care

Coordinating the speech and language development of needy individual within the southwest portion of the state of missouri.

$32k
Granted FY2022
2
Itemized grants FY2022
2
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2022
$12k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$6,418
Largest grant, FY2022
$6,418
Total assets, FY2022
$1.5M

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2022.

Individual grant recipient$6,418
Individual grant recipient$5,600

Compare Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care?

Find your warmest path to Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care

How much does Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care give?
Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care reported 2 itemized grants totaling $12,018, out of $31,835 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing.
Where is Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care based?
Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $15k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Valley of Joplin Scottish Rite Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home