Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Uw Harold S Geneen Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$691k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$9.5MHealth$5.8MCommunity Improvement$805kInternational$218kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+1 grant · $691k
$140,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC$691,078
CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE$145,000
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$140,000
BABSON COLLEGE$140,000
COLORADO COLLEGE$140,000
OBERLIN COLLEGE$140,000
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$140,000
QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY$140,000
LEHIGH UNIVERSITY$140,000
HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY$120,000
BARUCH COLLEGE FUND$93,140
MACALESTER COLLEGE$80,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW$68,220
COLBY COLLEGE$60,000
ONE TO WORLD INC$36,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BABSON COLLEGE: $140k → 7%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $140k → 16%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $144k → 11%CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE: $145k → 14%HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $120k → 6%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $140k → 14%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $135k → 7%QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $140k → 12%COLORADO COLLEGE: $145k → 9%OBERLIN COLLEGE: $140k → 13%BABSON COLLEGE: $105k → 7%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $140k → 16%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $144k → 11%CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE: $145k → 14%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $140k → 14%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $105k → 7%QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $140k → 12%COLORADO COLLEGE: $140k → 9%OBERLIN COLLEGE: $140k → 13%BABSON COLLEGE: $105k → 7%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $105k → 16%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $140k → 11%CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE: $145k → 14%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $140k → 14%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $105k → 7%QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $127k → 12%COLORADO COLLEGE: $140k → 9%OBERLIN COLLEGE: $140k → 13%BABSON COLLEGE: $105k → 7%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $105k → 16%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $108k → 11%CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE: $145k → 14%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $121k → 17%COLORADO COLLEGE: $140k → 9%OBERLIN COLLEGE: $140k → 13%CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE: $125k → 14%COLORADO COLLEGE: $140k → 9%CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE: $115k → 14%HEALTH RESOURCES IN: $781k → 16%HEALTH RESOURCES IN: $780k → 16%HEALTH RESOURCES IN: $765k → 16%HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $750k → 16%HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $750k → 16%HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $691k → 16%HEALTH RESOURCES IN: $624k → 16%BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $116k → 17%HEALTH RESOURCES IN: $596k → 16%BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $109k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 20 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$16M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+31%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +58%
  • CM
    Claremont McKenna College
    8× · 2018–2025 · $990k · revenue +86%
  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $930k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • BENTLEY UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $93k · revenue +31%
  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
4
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
9
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University and the most unlike its peers is Health Resources in Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE COLORADO COLLEGE — $930,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGEAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $910,000 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITYLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $883,730 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $875,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYOberlin College — $875,000 · EducationOberlin CollegeBABSON COLLEGE — $805,000 · EducationBABSON COLLEGEQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY — $777,000 · EducationQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITYTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND — $656,850 · EducationTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUNDHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $556,640 · EducationHOFSTRA UNIVERSITYWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $525,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITYMACALESTER COLLEGE — $500,000 · EducationMACALESTER COLLEGEThe President and Trustees of Colby College — $480,000 · EducationThe President and Trustees of Colby College+2 more — $224,095 · EducationHEALTH RESOURCES IN — $3,546,055 · OtherHEALTH RESOURCES INHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $2,191,078 · OtherHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INCClaremont McKenna College — $990,000 · OtherClaremont McKenna CollegeFORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL — $295,791 · Other+3 more — $189,160 · OtherONE TO WORLD INC — $217,500 · International
Education$8,998,315Other$7,212,084International$217,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $2,191,078 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetClaremont McKenna College — $990,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $930,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $910,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $883,730 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $875,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College — $875,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBABSON COLLEGE — $805,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY — $777,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND — $656,850 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $556,640 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $525,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE — $500,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College — $480,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetONE TO WORLD INC — $217,500 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetFordham University — $131,498 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $92,597 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC
  • Who funds Claremont McKenna College
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Oberlin College
  • Who funds BABSON COLLEGE
  • Who funds QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND
  • Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College
  • Who funds ONE TO WORLD INC
  • Who funds Fordham University
  • Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Uw Harold S Geneen Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Health Resources in Action Inc88% of income from government
  • Northeastern University4% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University1% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University0% of income from government
  • Babson College0% of income from government
  • Bentley University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Uw Harold S Geneen Charitable Tr?

Find your warmest path to Uw Harold S Geneen Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph