Skip to content
Uva Community Health Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Uva Community Health Foundation

The mission of uvachf is to raise community support and funding through charitable giving for much needed programs, improved facilities, and state of the art technology for uva community health, an integral part of uva health.

$355k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$284k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.2MEducation$85kEmployment$15kPublic Benefit$11k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $334,081, the rows itemized in this filing. The $355,154 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,073 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $284k
$284,081
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UVA PRINCE WILLIAM HEALTH SYSTEM (CANCER CENTER)$284,081
CULPEPER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%PRINCE WILLIAM HOSPITAL: $1.4M → 15%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 6%THE HOUSE SLC INC: $15k → 7%UVA CULPEPER MEDICAL CENTER: $89k → 8%UVA PRINCE WILLIAM HEALTH SYSTEM (CANCER CENTER): $284k → 9%PRINCE WILLIAM HOSPITAL: $101k → 15%MANASSAS PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $16k → 7%CULPEPER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50k → 8%UVA PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTER: $64k → 9%PRINCE WILLIAM HOSPITAL: $80k → 15%CITY OF MANASSAS: $11k → 7%UVA CULPEPER MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 8%UVA PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTER: $30k → 9%PRINCE WILLIAM HOSPITAL: $53k → 15%UVA PRINCE WILLIAM HEALTH SYSTEM (CANCER CENTER): $5k → 9%UVA PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTER: $33k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 3 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$2.2M
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+74%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UP
    UVA PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTER
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +56%
  • UP
    UVA PRINCE WILLIAM HEALTH SYSTEM
    2× · 2024–2025 · $290k · revenue +14%
  • UC
    UVA CULPEPER MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2021–2024 · $138k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • MP
    MANASSAS PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +74%
  • TH
    THE HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +89%
  • CO
    CITY OF MANASSAS
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UVA PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTER: $1,733,988 · HealthUVA PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTERUVA CULPEPER MEDICAL CENTER: $138,383 · HealthUVA CULPEPER MEDICAL CENTERUVA PRINCE WILLIAM HEALTH SYSTEM: $289,541 · OtherUVA PRINCE WILLIAM…CULPEPER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50,000 · OtherCULPEPER COUNTY PU…THE HOUSE INC: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $10,750 · OtherMANASSAS PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · EducationGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationPrince William County Public Schools Education Fou: $9,000 · Education
Health$1,872,371Other$365,291Education$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUVA PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTER: $1,733,988 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUVA PRINCE WILLIAM HEALTH SYSTEM: $289,541 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUVA CULPEPER MEDICAL CENTER: $138,383 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMANASSAS PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrince William County Public Schools Education Fou: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uva Community Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uva Community Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Uva Community Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home