Skip to content
Utah World Trade Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Utah World Trade Center

World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.

$638k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Community Improvement$723kScience & Tech$198kHealth$135kEmployment$108kRecreation & Sports$80kInternational$67kFood & Nutrition$46kEnvironment$43kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $138,287, the rows itemized in this filing. The $638,252 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $499,965 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $53k
$6,312
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Diacor Inc$15,000
Alegra Learning Incorporated$15,000
IsoTruss Inc$11,365
Integrated Medical Holdings LLC dba Cathtip$11,250
PMD Beauty$9,724
Global Autism Coalition$9,465
SilverCeuticals Inc$6,750
Glacier Games LLC$6,500
Dark Energy LLC$6,312
FireAvert LLC$6,250
Hand Out Gloves LLC$6,146
Alpha Mountain AI$6,000
Uplift Aerospace LLC$6,000
Hypercraft Inc$6,000
Optisys Inc$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%TDP DATA SYSTEMS LLC: $10k → 8%SAWTOOTH: $17k → 5%UPLIFT AEROSPACE LLC: $18k → 5%RBH SOUND: $11k → 6%HYPERCOMP ENGINEERING INC: $12k → 8%INTERGALACTIC: $10k → 10%CBC BEVCO: $13k → 13%CSS COMPOSITES LLC: $13k → 15%SAWTOOTH TONNEAU LLC: $15k → 5%3HELIX INC: $11k → 8%CBC BEVCO: $11k → 13%SAWTOOTH TONNEAU LLC: $15k → 5%HEC SOFTWARE INC: $15k → 6%KEMPER SNOWBOARDS LLC: $12k → 5%KEMPER SNOWBOARDS LLC: $10k → 5%CRORZAR LLC: $12k → 10%NCAP MEDICAL LLC: $19k → 5%SUNWARRIOR VENTURES LLC: $11k → 10%SKILL BOARD: $10k → 8%HONE LLC: $11k → 10%DIACOR INC: $15k → 8%NEONATAL RESCUE LLC: $13k → 8%TORO DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING LLC: $15k → 10%VITALPAX: $11k → 10%ISOTRUSS INC: $11k → 8%TETON SPORTS - AP: $12k → 8%ROMARIC AUTOMATION DESIGN INC: $25k → 8%LION ENERGY LLC: $12k → 8%HAND OUT GLOVES LLC: $16k → 8%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $12k → 8%SMART PROJECTS LLC: $12k → 8%SAN DIABLO LLC: $11k → 8%VUE CORP: $10k → 8%M-VAC SYSTEMS: $10k → 8%MENA GROUP LLC: $25k → 8%HEALIXIR HEALTH: $13k → 8%MENA GROUP LLC: $13k → 8%HYPERCRAFT INC: $11k → 8%HEALIXIR HEALTH: $12k → 8%MINDTUNE LLC: $14k → 8%AXCEND LLC: $10k → 8%A BETTER DRILL INC: $12k → 8%PMD BEAUTY: $15k → 8%DPS SKIS: $10k → 8%UINTA DIGITAL: $15k → 8%ITIVATE: $12k → 8%REVSTEP LLC: $12k → 8%REVSTEP LLC: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$700k · 33 repeat orgs$746k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
79

Total granted

$700k
$675k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SAWTOOTH
    4× · 2020–2023 · $56k
  • MG
    MENA GROUP LLC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $38k
  • DI
    Diacor Inc
    3× · 2020–2024 · $36k

Funded once

  • RA
    ROMARIC AUTOMATION DESIGN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • UD
    UINTA DIGITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • TD
    TORO DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2019 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAWTOOTH: $55,500 · Other+120 more: $1,389,763 · Other+120 more
Other$1,445,263

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Utah World Trade Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home