· Public charity
Utah Health Information Network Inc
Utah health information network (uhin) reduces healthcare costs and improves quality and access for the community by assuring that providers, payers, and patients can exchange information electronically.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $250k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $659k
- $250k+2 grants · $804k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRANTS & CONTRAC | $552,644 |
| IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC | $250,865 |
| UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH | $231,554 |
| HEALTH INSIGHT | $218,483 |
| ESO SOLUTIONSINC | $90,000 |
| IDAHO HEALTH DATA EXCHANGE | $64,428 |
| NEHII INC | $54,550 |
| KANE COUNTY HOSPITAL | $31,985 |
| CENTRAL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER | $31,985 |
| GRANGER CLINIC | $27,500 |
| HEALTHIE NEVADA | $20,110 |
| IDAHO HEALTH DATA EXCHANGE | $19,532 |
| TANNER CLINIC | $18,000 |
| WASATCH PEAK FAMILY PRACTICE | $16,750 |
| BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL | $15,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 14% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To encourage and support a healthier community.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.
Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
We serve our rural communities with complete quality care and friendly customer service, providing exceptional healthcare for all.
To improve quality of life through comprehensive, self-empowered, culturally-sensitive healthcare and amazing customer service.
To support Oroville Hospital in it's ongoing mission and to ensure the Oroville Community has access to comprehensive health care services now and in the future.
We improve healthcare one patient at a time in a friendly and professional culture committed to superior quality and safety.
NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…
Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthinsight Management Corp and the most unlike its peers is Central Valley Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHINSIGHT MANAGEMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA HEALTH INFORMATION INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Central Valley Medical Center ↗
- Who funds HEALTHIE NEVADA ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds MOAB VALLEY HEALTHCARE INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Utah Health Information Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.