Skip to content

· Public charity

Utah Film Center

UTAH FILM CENTER inspires and engages diverse audiences to initiate conversation and community building through curated film exhibition, educational programs, and artist support.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
56
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$47MYouth Development$2.9MEnvironment$2.3MHuman Services$2.2MHealth$1.9MReligion$888kScience & Tech$730kEducation$580kOther$0
02FY2024 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 56 grants below total $9,778,388, the rows itemized in this filing. The $17,872,277 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,093,889 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $701k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+11 grants · $6.8M
$52,040
Median grant
10
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FINCH NO WORRIES INC$1,388,231
READY OR NOT LLC$854,900
INTERLOPER FILMS INC$756,093
GAUCHO GAUCHO PRODUCTIONS LLC$691,114
SEA CHANGE FILMS LLC$664,128
THE KELLY SLATER PROJECT PTY LTD SONGBIRD STUDIOS$626,821
THE RIVER PROJECT INC SONGBIRD STUDIOS$431,925
Individual grant recipient$414,940
KELLY SLATER PROJECT SONGBIRD STUDIOS INC$379,964
A REAL LOVE PRODUCTION LLC$331,976
FAITH FILM LLC$267,783
THERE WAS THERE WAS NOT LLC$249,976
EVERGREEN STUDIO INC$234,952
THE OTHRS LLC$227,938
STORY SYNDICATE LLC$211,464
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%BREAKING CHAINS LLC: $47k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 99 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

99 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 77 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

99
133

Total granted

$44M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-85%
+30%

Still filing today

1%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHAIN CAMERA PICTURES
    5× · 2017–2022 · $4.0M
  • FN
    FINCH NO WORRIES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.0M
  • TO
    THE OTHRS LLC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $1.8M

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GLORIAS LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $747k
  • AB
    ANOTHER BODY LTD
    one grant, 2023 · $686k
  • MP
    MENSCH PIX LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $663k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Untrafficked Inc
Human Services
2
Uprising Theater
Arts & Culture
3
Darrell Smith Studios Productions Inc

Stop Domestic Violence and human trafficking

Youth Development
4
Unchained

Unchained utilizes artistic expression to advocate for the survivors of human trafficking through: raising awareness, empowering healing, and equipping holistic restoration.

—
5
Driftseed

To create a more safe, just and prosperous world for women and girls through education, outreach and the art of documentary storytelling (sponsorship of doc. filmmakers, screenings, lectures, workshops in schools/communities, educational…

Arts & Culture
6
Changemakertrust Inc

making documentary and films

Science & Tech
7
International Society of Human Unity

The International Society of Human Unity's is a charitable and educational organization dedicated to promoting nonviolence, compassion, empowerment and raise awareness about human rights issues, such as human trafficking, through campaigns…

International
8
Trapped Voices Inc
Crime & Legal
9
Apsara Studios Inc
Youth Development
10
Artists for Change Inc

Create high impact film, television and multimedia projects to inspire individuals, organizations, and communities to bring about positive social change.

Arts & Culture
11
Communication for Change Inc
Unclassified
12
Gratis 7 Media Group Inc
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ripple of Hope Filmsinc Dba New Frontier Films Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Healthy Us Collaborative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 266 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHAIN CAMERA PICTURES (MED): $4,019,919 · OtherCHAIN CAMERA PICTURES (MED)FINCH NO WORRIES INC: $2,007,531 · Other+194 more: $53,264,006 · Other+194 moreTHE HEALTHY US COLLABORATIVE INC: $514,864 · HealthUNLEASHED PRODUCTIONS INC: $142,981 · PhilanthropyRIPPLE OF HOPE FILMSINC DBA NEW FRONTIER FILMS INC: $47,600 · Arts & CultureBREAKING CHAINS: $46,988 · Human Services
Other$59,291,456Health$514,864Philanthropy$142,981Arts & Culture$47,600Human Services$46,988

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNLEASHED PRODUCTIONS INC: $142,981 over 2y, 12% of budgetRIPPLE OF HOPE FILMSINC DBA NEW FRONTIER FILMS INC: $47,600 over 1y, 25% of budgetBREAKING CHAINS: $46,988 over 1y, 28% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HEALTHY US COLLABORATIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Documentary Foundation IncCA29.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Documentary Foundation Inc · Sundance Institute · The Ford Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Utah Film Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Utah Film Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 266 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Utah Film Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph