Skip to content
Utah Chamber at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Utah Chamber

We stand as the voice of business, support our member's success and champion community prosperity.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Community Improvement$367kRecreation & Sports$16kSocial Science$15kArts & Culture$12kEducation$11k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $51,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $54,750 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WTC Utah$35,000
SLC Committee for the Games$10,000
Days of '47 Rodeo$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UTAH WORLD TRADE CENTER: $50k → 8%Brigham Young University: $6k → 8%SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%SALT LAKE CHAMBER WOMEN'S BUSINES: $44k → 8%WORLD TRADE CENTER: $40k → 8%WASATCH INNOVATION NETWORK: $39k → 8%WTC Utah: $35k → 8%Utah World Trade Center: $35k → 8%UTAH WORLD TRADE CENTER: $31k → 8%GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECON OPP: $15k → 8%WASATCH INNOVATION NETWORK: $13k → 8%SLC Committee for the Games: $10k → 8%DOWNTOWN ALLIANCE: $10k → 8%DAYS OF 47 RODEO SALT LAKE: $6k → 8%Days of 47 Rodeo: $6k → 8%Days of '47 Rodeo: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$331k · 4 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$331k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+150%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    Utah World Trade Center
    5× · 2020–2025 · $191k · revenue +101%
  • AO
    Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +14%
  • DO
    DAYS OF 47 RODEO SALT LAKE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • SL
    Salt Lake Chamber Women's Business Center
    one grant, 2022 · $44k · revenue -39%
  • SO
    STATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • DA
    Downtown Alliance Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +150%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Utah World Trade Center: $191,250 · Community ImprovementUtah World Trade CenterSalt Lake Chamber Women's Business Center: $44,000 · Community ImprovementSalt Lake Chamber Women's Business CenterAssociation of Chamber of Commerce Executives Inc: $70,000 · OtherAssociation of Chamber of Commerce Executi…WASATCH INNOVATION NETWORK: $52,178 · OtherWASATCH INNOVATION NETWORKSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $15,000 · OtherSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMI…Downtown Alliance Inc: $10,000 · OtherDowntown Alliance IncBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherDAYS OF 47 RODEO SALT LAKE: $18,000 · Arts & CultureSALT LAKE CITY - UTAH COMMITTEE FOR THE GAMES: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Community Improvement$235,250Other$157,678Arts & Culture$18,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUtah World Trade Center: $191,250 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetAssociation of Chamber of Commerce Executives Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWASATCH INNOVATION NETWORK: $52,178 over 2y, 46% of budgetSalt Lake Chamber Women's Business Center: $44,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetDAYS OF 47 RODEO SALT LAKE: $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDowntown Alliance Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Utah Chamber funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Utah Chamber. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Utah Chamber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home