Skip to content

California · Public charity

Usta Northern California

To promote and develop the growth of tennis as an inclusive and inviting lifetime activity in the northern california section.

$214k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2024
8
Organizations funded FY2023
88%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$27k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$7,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$7,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 8
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$7.3M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 88% of the organizations Usta Northern California funded were first-time grantees, receiving 86% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$27k50%
FY20238$52k88%
FY20222$13k50%
FY20201$6k0%
FY20193$53k0%
FY20183$73k33%
FY20173$89kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$303kEducation$8k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Usta Norcal Foundation$171,2503n/a
Far West Wheelchair Athletic Association Incorporated$28,67043%
Teaming Individuals Emphasizing Sports$24,8584n/a
Berkeley Tennis Club Foundation$14,00027%
The Ascension Project$12,500211%
Twin Rivers Unified School District$8,0001n/a
Spare Time Inc$7,6001n/a
Cello International Tennis Academy$7,5001n/a
Challenged Athletes Inc$6,25010%
Tiburon Peninsula Club$6,00010%
Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Usta Northern California by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Usta Norcal Foundation$171,2503n/a
Far West Wheelchair Athletic Association Incorporated$28,67043%
Teaming Individuals Emphasizing Sports$24,8584n/a
Berkeley Tennis Club Foundation$14,00027%
The Ascension Project$12,500211%
Twin Rivers Unified School District$8,0001n/a
Spare Time Inc$7,6001n/a
Cello International Tennis Academy$7,5001n/a
Challenged Athletes Inc$6,25010%
Tiburon Peninsula Club$6,00010%
Youth Tennis Advantage$6,00011%
Placer Junior Golf & Tennis$6,0001n/a
United States Tennis Association Southwest Section Inc$5,36510%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($8k), not named here.

Compare Usta Northern California with peer funders

About Usta Northern California

How much does Usta Northern California give?
Usta Northern California reported 4 itemized grants totaling $26,500, out of $213,869 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 8 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Usta Northern California fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (97%), Education (3%).
Who are Usta Northern California's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Usta Norcal Foundation ($171k), Far West Wheelchair Athletic Association Incorporated ($29k), Teaming Individuals Emphasizing Sports ($25k).
Does Usta Northern California fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 88% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Usta Northern California based?
Usta Northern California is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Usta Northern California’s filings →

More from the funding graph