Skip to content
Uspoultry & Egg Associationinc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Uspoultry & Egg Associationinc

To partner with our state affiliates and national organizations to augment and influence each other's efforts in attacking common problems, avoiding duplication.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$662k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$4.8MScience & Tech$3.2MEducation$1.5MFood & Nutrition$182k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $594k
  • $250k+2 grants · $912k
$125,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN$661,791
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$250,449
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$224,306
USDA AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE$125,000
FSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$79,763
FOUR RIVERS KENNEL$60,000
NC STATE UNIVERSITY$55,225
FATS & PROTEINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AVISERVE LLC: $35k → 10%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $123k → 16%USDA AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE: $125k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS: $151k → 14%FSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $80k → 19%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $125k → 15%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $115k → 20%FOUR RIVERS KENNEL: $60k → 18%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $205k → 8%GA TECH APPLIED RESEARCH: $124k → 14%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $180k → 27%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $79k → 19%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $80k → 15%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $193k → 24%FATS & PROTEINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%VIRGINIA TECH: $115k → 21%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $224k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $99k → 11%USDA AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE: $57k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS: $76k → 14%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $101k → 15%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $145k → 8%GA TECH APPLIED RESEARCH: $75k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $152k → 27%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 15%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $124k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $64k → 11%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $80k → 15%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $75k → 8%USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $1.3M → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $150k → 27%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $117k → 24%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $69k → 8%USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $1.0M → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $109k → 27%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $89k → 24%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $55k → 8%USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $753k → 14%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $104k → 27%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $76k → 24%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $36k → 8%USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $662k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $75k → 27%USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $658k → 14%USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $152k → 14%USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $143k → 14%USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $50k → 14%USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
DE
KS
AR
NC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 14 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$8.4M
$539k

Still filing today

7%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $665k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.7M
  • NS
    NC STATE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $614k
  • MS
    MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $599k

Funded once

  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $123k
  • KS
    KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $115k
  • VT
    VIRGINIA TECH
    one grant, 2018 · $115k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDN: $4,718,509 · OtherUSPOULTRY HAROLD E FORD FDNNC STATE UNIVERSITY: $614,102 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $598,614 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $507,059 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA+19 more: $2,847,785 · Other+19 moreUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $283,448 · EducationFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $79,763 · Education
Other$9,286,069Education$363,211

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $283,448 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $79,763 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFATS AND PROTEINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FATS AND PROTEINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uspoultry & Egg Associationinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uspoultry & Egg Associationinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Uspoultry & Egg Associationinc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home