Skip to content

· Public charity

US Incorporated

Undertake educational programs informing the public of the need for common-sense immigration policies; the need to consider population growth on the environment and our ability to protect and conserve our natural resources; and the need to preserve and promote english as the unifying language of the united states.

$549k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$240k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Civil Rights$312kEducation$250kInternational$240kArts & Culture$160kEnvironment$42kPublic Benefit$33kHuman Services$15kEmployment$10k
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $524k
$160,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$999k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NUMBERSUSA SUPPORT ORGANIZATION$240,000
BORDER HAWK NEWS CORP$160,000
FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION$124,200
CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ANGEL FAMILIES: $15k → 11%THE REMEMBRANCE PROJECT: $100k → 14%PROTECT US WORKERS: $10k → 9%FLORIDIANS FOR A SUSTAINABLE POPULATION: $25k → 11%BORDER HAWK NEWS CORP: $160k → 9%OREGONIANS FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM: $135k → 14%RESPECT WASHINGTON: $23k → 9%NUMBERSUSA SUPPORT ORGANIZATION: $240k → 7%AVIAC: $7k → 11%FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION: $124k → 14%FLORIDANS FOR A SUSTAINABLE POPULATION: $17k → 11%OREGONIANS FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM: $22k → 14%RESPECT WASHINGTON: $10k → 9%CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
OR
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$481k · 4 repeat orgs$581k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$481k
$32k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $549k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’22
InternationalEducationSocial ScienceCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE REMEMBRANCE PROJECT
    2× · 2017–2018 · $250k · revenue -83% · 74% of their budget
  • OF
    OREGONIANS FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM
    2× · 2017–2018 · $157k · 89% of their budget
  • FF
    FLORIDIANS FOR A SUSTAINABLE POPULATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $42k

Funded once

  • AF
    ANGEL FAMILIES
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • PU
    PROTECT US WORKERS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • A
    AVIAC
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/6
Grantees still filing
0/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NUMBERSUSA SUPPORT ORGANIZATION: $240,000 · InternationalNUMBERSUSA SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONFEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM: $124,200 · InternationalFEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION RE…OREGONIANS FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM: $156,600 · OtherOREGONIANS FOR IMMIGRATION R…FLORIDIANS FOR A SUSTAINABLE POPULATION: $42,000 · OtherFLORIDIANS FOR A SUSTAINABLE…RESPECT WASHINGTON: $32,500 · OtherRESPECT WASHINGTONANGEL FAMILIES: $15,000 · OtherANGEL FAMILIESPROTECT US WORKERS: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $6,500 · OtherTHE REMEMBRANCE PROJECT: $250,000 · EducationTHE REMEMBRANCE PROJECTBORDER HAWK NEWS CORP: $160,000 · Social ScienceBORDER HAWK NEWS …Center for Immigration Studies Inc: $25,000 · Civil Rights
International$364,200Other$262,600Education$250,000Social Science$160,000Civil Rights$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE REMEMBRANCE PROJECT: $250,000 over 2y, 74% of budgetNUMBERSUSA SUPPORT ORGANIZATION: $240,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetBORDER HAWK NEWS CORP: $160,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetOREGONIANS FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM: $156,600 over 2y, 89% of budgetFEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM: $124,200 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCenter for Immigration Studies Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization US Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from US Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to US Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to US Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on US’ filings →

    More from the funding graph