Skip to content
Upper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Upper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc

The upper chesapeake health foundation supports the mission of university of maryland upper chesapeake health system through developing relationships with local citizens and organizations who wish to take part in the expansion and improvement of healthcare services provided in harford county.

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$25M
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,009,093
Median grant
1
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARFORD CRISIS CENTER INC$2,544,130
UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER INC$1,009,093
UPPER CHESAPEAKE RESIDENTIAL HOSPICE HOUSE INC$323,444
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $17.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HARFORD CRISIS CENTER INC: $3.1M → 11%HARFORD CRISIS CENTER INC: $3.0M → 11%Harford Crisis Center Inc: $2.7M → 11%HARFORD CRISIS CENTER INC: $2.5M → 11%HARFORD CRISIS CENTER INC: $1.8M → 11%HARFORD CRISIS CENTER INC: $1.7M → 11%HARFORD CRISIS CENTER INC: $500k → 11%UPPER CHESAPEAKE RESIDENTIAL HOSPICE HOUSE INC: $450k → 7%Upper Chesapeake Residential Hospice House Inc: $450k → 7%UPPER CHESAPEAKE RESIDENTIAL HOSPICE HOUSE INC: $450k → 7%UPPER CHESAPEAKE RESIDENTIAL HOSPICE HOUSE INC: $323k → 7%UPPER CHESAPEAKE RESIDENTIAL HOSPICE HOUSE: $250k → 7%UPPER CHESAPEAKE RESIDENTIAL HOSPICE HOUSE: $250k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$25M
$0

Still filing today

86%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    Harford Crisis Center Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15M · revenue +20% · 73% of their budget
  • UC
    Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $7.1M · revenue +58%
  • UO
    University of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Health System Inc
    6× · 2018–2023 · $120k · revenue +5%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    4/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Harford Crisis Center Inc: $15,224,583 · Human ServicesHarford Crisis Center IncUpper Chesapeake Residential Hospice House Inc: $2,173,972 · Human ServicesUpper Chesapeake Residential Hospice House IncUpper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc: $7,126,578 · HealthUpper Chesapeake Medical Center I…+3 more: $353,657 · HealthUPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL SERVICES: $500,000 · Other
    Human Services$17,398,555Health$7,480,235Other$500,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHarford Crisis Center Inc: $15,224,583 over 7y, 73% of budgetUpper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc: $7,126,578 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUpper Chesapeake Residential Hospice House Inc: $2,173,972 over 6y, 58% of budgetHarford Memorial Hospital Inc: $195,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Health System Inc: $119,748 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUpper Chesapeake Medical Services Inc: $38,909 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Upper Chesapeake Medi…
    Upper Chesapeake Medical Center IncMD15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Upper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Upper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      4get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Upper Chesapeake Health’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home