Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Unravel

To raise awareness about the lack of funding for pediatric cancer research.

$210k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$4.1M
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $205,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $209,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$418k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Seattle Children's Hospital$100,000
State University of Iowa Foundation (UI Center for Advancement)$50,000
Rady Children's Hospital Foundation$25,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$20,000
Lucile Packard Foundation for Children$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children: $40k → 8%Rady Children's Hospital Foundation: $25k → 11%UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $63k → 13%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF LA: $165k → 14%WEIL CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $78k → 17%Texas Children's Hospital: $20k → 16%Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: $40k → 8%Emory University Dept of Pediatrics: $12k → 14%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $715k → 9%Lurie Children's Hospital: $10k → 14%John Hopkins University: $25k → 19%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children: $30k → 8%UC Santa Cruz Foundation: $20k → 13%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF LA: $28k → 14%WEIL CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $78k → 17%Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: $14k → 8%Seattle Children's Hospital: $645k → 9%Lurie Children's Hospital: $10k → 14%John Hopkins University: $20k → 19%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children: $20k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF LA: $28k → 14%WEIL CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: $14k → 8%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $275k → 9%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children: $20k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF LA: $10k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $50k → 17%THE CRANE LAB: $88k → 9%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children: $10k → 8%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $50k → 17%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $100k → 9%MONJE LABS STANFORD MEDICAL: $270k → 8%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $29k → 17%THE CRANE LAB: $88k → 9%MONJE LABS STANFORD MEDICAL: $65k → 8%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $20k → 17%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $100k → 9%MONJE LABS STANFORD MEDICAL: $65k → 8%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $20k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
CA
MD
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 12 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$3.6M
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+39%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Seattle Children's Foundation
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +190%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +27%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    8× · 2017–2024 · $231k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • US
    UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $63k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +30%
  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL (DBA PINK POLKA DOTS JOG)
    one grant, 2019 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
4
The Association of Chrmc and University Physicians

Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…

Health
5
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
6
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
9
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
10
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
11
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
12
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Seattle Children's Foundation — $1,205,000 · OtherSeattle Children's FoundationFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $1,190,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers — $205,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversTREEHOUSE PROJECT — $96,000 · Other+3 more — $146,000 · OtherChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $231,437 · HealthChildren's Hospital L…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $169,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTER…UNRAVEL — $130,000 · HealthUNRAVELLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $120,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDA…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $40,000 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL (DBA PINK POLKA DOTS JOG) — $30,000 · Health+3 more — $60,000 · Health+3 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $270,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF…STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationSTATE UNIVER…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $45,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKIN…UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Education+2 more — $21,563 · EducationRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,842,000Health$780,437Education$456,563Philanthropy$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSeattle Children's Foundation — $1,205,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $1,190,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $270,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $231,437 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $169,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNRAVEL — $130,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $120,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute — $68,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University — $11,563 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Unravel funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute — 44% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Unravel?

Find your warmest path to Unravel through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines