Skip to content
University of Lynchburg at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities.

$32M
Granted FY2025still arriving
—
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
—
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
01What it funds
01FY2025

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$0
Median grant
—
States reached
$261M
Total assets
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

Grants abroad, by region: $6.2M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$3.3M · 54% · 166 people

Stated purpose: Unfunded Institutional Aid · Funded Institutional Aid

South America$1.3M · 21% · 55 people

Stated purpose: Unfunded Institutional Aid

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$636k · 10% · 26 people

Stated purpose: Unfunded Institutional Aid

Sub-Saharan Africa$389k · 6% · 18 people

Stated purpose: Unfunded Institutional Aid · Funded Institutional Aid

Central America and the Caribbean$218k · 3% · 9 people

Stated purpose: Unfunded Institutional Aid · Funded Institutional Aid

North America (Canada and Mexico)$122k · 2% · 5 people

Stated purpose: Unfunded Institutional Aid

East Asia and the Pacific$99k · 2% · 4 people

Stated purpose: Unfunded Institutional Aid · Funded Institutional Aid

Russia and Neighboring States$78k · 1% · 4 people

Stated purpose: Unfunded Institutional Aid

Middle East and North Africa$66k · 1% · 2 people

Stated purpose: Unfunded Institutional Aid

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home