Skip to content

· Private foundation

University Industry Research Corporation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Science & Tech$6.6MEducation$2.9MRecreation & Sports$25k
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$41,625
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION (DBA DISCOVERE)$41,625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 57% of grant dollars ($5.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 43% that went abroad ($4.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $520k → 8%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $750k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $1.3M → 10%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $115k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $165k → 9%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%NATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION (DBA DISCOVERE): $42k → 6%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $400k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $750k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $1.3M → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MA
OR
PA
RI
CA
VA
TN

Beyond the US: 43% of all-years giving ($4.1M)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$1.2M · 15 grants
Switzerland$1.2M · 8 grants
Israel$864k · 4 grants
China$600k · 2 grants
Spain$200k · 2 grants
France$40k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 47% of University Industry Research Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

University Industry Research Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 36% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 13 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2021, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$5.6M
$1.4M

Still filing today

0%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2.5M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $540k
  • MP
    MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $480k

Funded once

  • TU
    TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $450k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $265k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2017 · $165k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carnegie Mellon University; the most unlike its peers is National Engineers Week Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $2,500,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEYIndividual grant recipient: $540,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS: $480,000 · OtherMAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMSTSINGHUA UNIVERSITY: $450,000 · OtherTSINGHUA UNIVERSITYTECHNION RESEARCH & DEV FOUNDATION: $449,000 · OtherTECHNION RESEARCH & DEV FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF ZURICH: $390,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ZURICHUNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG: $340,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $265,000 · OtherECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE DE LAUSANNE: $260,000 · OtherTECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAT DARMSTADT: $230,000 · Other+10 more: $985,000 · Other+10 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE L…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $920,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Tec…THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · Education+2 more: $66,625 · EducationBROWN UNIVERSITY: $115,000 · Community ImprovementNorthwestern University: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$6,889,000Education$2,576,625Community Improvement$115,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $920,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $115,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION: $41,625 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNorthwestern University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University Industry Research Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University Industry Research Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Portland State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to University Industry Research Corporation?

Find your warmest path to University Industry Research Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on University Industry Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph