Skip to content
University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development

Internet2 promotes the missions of its members by providing both leading-edge network capabilities and unique partnership opportunities that together facilitate the development, deployment and use of revolutionary internet technologies.

$660k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$219k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Science & Tech$2.1MEducation$805kEmployment$424k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $586k
$51,105
Median grant
9
States reached
$160M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jackson State University$218,814
University of Maryland Eastern Shore$175,621
Florida A&M University$72,153
Salish Kootenai College$68,136
Claflin University$51,105
University of Utah$45,563
Georgia Tech Research Corporation$16,145
Tennessee State University$6,652
The Regents of the University of California San Diego$5,373
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $511k → 8%Salish Kootenai College: $68k → 18%The Regents of the University of California San Diego: $73k → 11%The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $832k → 14%Claflin University: $51k → 25%The George Washington University: $62k → 14%Florida A&M University: $72k → 19%The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System: $55k → 10%Tennessee State University: $7k → 14%University of Utah: $152k → 8%Georgia Tech Research Corporation: $16k → 13%The Trustees of Indiana University: $35k → 18%Purdue University: $55k → 19%Jackson State University: $219k → 10%American Indian Higher Education Consortium: $30k → 9%University of Maryland Eastern Shore: $176k → 22%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $112k → 8%Salish Kootenai College: $41k → 18%The Regents of the University of California San Diego: $57k → 11%The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $106k → 14%The George Washington University: $18k → 14%The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System: $23k → 10%University of Utah: $104k → 8%The Trustees of Indiana University: $18k → 18%Purdue University: $26k → 19%Jackson State University: $59k → 10%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $50k → 8%The Regents of the University of California San Diego: $30k → 11%The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $50k → 14%University of Utah: $46k → 8%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $21k → 8%The Regents of the University of California San Diego: $30k → 11%Harvard University: $41k → 8%The Regents of the University of California San Diego: $7k → 11%Harvard University: $29k → 8%The Regents of the University of California San Diego: $5k → 11%Harvard University: $12k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
WI
NY
MA
IN
CA
UT
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 9 repeat orgs$352k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$2.2M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+18%

Still filing today

33%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $322k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Research Foundation for The State University of New York
    3× · 2019–2021 · $989k · revenue +55%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $302k
  • JS
    JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $278k

Funded once

  • AI
    American Indian Higher Education Consortium Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
10
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The George Washington University; the most unlike its peers is Salish Kootenai College Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $988,601 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New YorkMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $693,802 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologySALISH KOOTENAI COLLEGE INC: $109,154 · EducationSALISH KOOTENAI COLLEGE INCPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $82,481 · EducationThe George Washington University: $80,330 · Education+1 more: $51,105 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $301,507 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHJACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $277,671 · OtherJACKSON STATE UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $203,291 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT …UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $175,621 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $80,990 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Wisconsin Madison: $77,245 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonFLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY TERM: $72,153 · OtherFLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIVERS…Indiana University School of Medicine: $52,933 · Other+2 more: $37,016 · OtherGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $16,145 · Health
Education$2,005,473Other$1,278,427Health$16,145

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $988,601 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $693,802 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSALISH KOOTENAI COLLEGE INC: $109,154 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $82,481 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $80,330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLAFLIN UNIVERSITY: $51,105 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Indian Higher Education Consortium Inc: $30,364 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $16,145 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds SALISH KOOTENAI COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds CLAFLIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Indian Higher Education Consortium Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home