Skip to content
United Way of Wise County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Wise County Inc

To conduct annual fund-raising campaigns to solicit contributions for distribution to united way agenices within wise county, texas.

$359k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$823kPublic Safety & Disaster$344kEducation$320kCrime & Legal$267kReligion$218kHealth$152kArts & Culture$130kFood & Nutrition$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $348,899, the rows itemized in this filing. The $359,459 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,560 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $285k
$10,300
Median grant
—
States reached
$411k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NORTH TEXAS$35,000
WISE AREA RELIEF MISSION$33,600
WISE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING$26,000
WISE CHRISTIAN COUNSELING (WISE CCC)$20,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS FOR NORTH TEXAS$20,000
WISE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TASK FORCE$20,000
MHMR FOUNDATION$19,200
CASA OF WISE AND JACK COUNTIES$16,800
SALVATION ARMY - WISE SERVICE UNIT$14,400
SOUTHEAST WISE COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES$14,000
ACTS 4 OTHERS$14,000
TEXOMA AREA PARATRANSIT SYSTEM (TAPS)$11,250
CENTRAL TEXAS OPPORTUNITIES (HEAD START)$10,300
WISE CHOICES PRC INC$10,000
MADE 2 THRIVE$10,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 30 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
4

Total granted

$2.6M
$28k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $184k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WISE AREA RELIEF MISSION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $322k
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF N TEXAS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $225k
  • WC
    WISE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING
    8× · 2017–2024 · $213k

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS - BIG COUNTRY
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • FW
    FEEDING WISE KIDS
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • TR
    TEXAS RAMP PROJECT
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WISE AREA RELIEF MISSION: $321,814 · OtherWISE AREA RELIEF MISSIONCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF N TEXAS: $224,600 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF N TEXASWISE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $212,688 · OtherWISE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGINGWISE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TASK: $161,810 · OtherWISE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TASKCASA OF WISE AND JACK COUNTIES: $159,585 · OtherCASA OF WISE AND JACK COUNTIESIndividual grant recipient: $123,300 · OtherMHMR VISIONS: $112,000 · OtherSOUTH WISE SERVICES: $110,720 · OtherACTS 4 OTHERS: $109,259 · OtherWISE CCC: $108,852 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $102,497 · Other+36 more: $1,045,560 · Other+36 more
Other$2,792,685

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of Wise County’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home