Skip to content
United Way of St Francois County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of St Francois County Inc

The united way of st.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$483kHuman Services$199kHealth$72kCommunity Improvement$7kYouth Development$6k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $43,466, the rows itemized in this filing. The $99,716 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $56,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$123k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FARMINGTON SVDP FOOD PANTRY$8,000
SALVATION ARMY$7,466
ELVINS FOOD PANTRY$7,000
FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$7,000
BONNE TERRE FOOD PANTRY$7,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION FOOD PANTRY$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $192k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%ELVINS FOOD PANTRY: $18k → 19%ELVINS FOOD PANTRY: $15k → 19%ELVINS FOOD PANTRY: $14k → 19%ELVINS FOOD PANTRY: $13k → 19%ELVINS FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 19%ELVINS FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 19%ELVINS FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 19%FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $17k → 19%FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $15k → 19%FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $15k → 19%FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $14k → 19%FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $14k → 19%FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $13k → 19%FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $12k → 19%FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $7k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$725k · 12 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$725k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+55%

Still filing today

25%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FM
    FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +247%
  • EF
    ELVINS FOOD PANTRY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $86k · revenue +8%
  • PH
    PARK HILLS SENIOR CENTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $24k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • SV
    ST VINCENT DEPAUL - FARMINGTON
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • US
    UPWARD SMILES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +173%
  • PF
    PARKLAND FOSTER ADOPT FAMILIES
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION FOOD PANTRY: $105,889 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION FOOD PANTRYFARMINGTON SVDP FOOD PANTRY: $98,188 · OtherFARMINGTON SVDP FOOD PANTRYBONNE TERRE FOOD PANTRY: $93,846 · OtherBONNE TERRE FOOD PANTRYSALVATION ARMY: $67,688 · OtherSALVATION ARMYLIFE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $63,500 · OtherLIFE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGFARMINGTON SENIOR CENTER: $27,544 · OtherPARK HILLS SENIOR CENTER: $23,708 · OtherVISIONS OF HOPE: $18,500 · Other+4 more: $55,043 · Other+4 moreFARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $105,698 · Human ServicesFARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIA…ELVINS FOOD PANTRY INC: $86,286 · Human ServicesELVINS FOOD PANTRY INCUPWARD SMILES INC: $8,000 · HealthEAST MISSOURI ACTION AGENCY INC: $6,500 · Community ImprovementROCKY CREEK YOUTH RANCH INCORPORATE: $5,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$553,906Human Services$191,984Health$8,000Community Improvement$6,500Housing & Shelter$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $105,698 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetELVINS FOOD PANTRY INC: $86,286 over 7y, 19% of budgetPARK HILLS SENIOR CENTER: $23,708 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetUPWARD SMILES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEAST MISSOURI ACTION AGENCY INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY CREEK YOUTH RANCH INCORPORATE: $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ELVINS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK HILLS SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UPWARD SMILES INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST MISSOURI ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY CREEK YOUTH RANCH INCORPORATE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of St Francois County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of St Francois County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $118k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of St Francois County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home