Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Lee County Inc

The mission of the united way of lee county, inc.

$521k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$837kHuman Services$681kYouth Development$509kPublic Safety & Disaster$348kFood & Nutrition$279kCrime & Legal$267kEducation$215kAnimals$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $439,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $520,751 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $81,651 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $402k
$20,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALABAMA SHERIFF'S GIRLS RANCH$42,000
EAST ALABAMA MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS$42,000
COMMUNITY MARKET OF THE EAST ALABAMA FOOD BANK$40,000
LEE COUNTY LITERACY COALITION INC$40,000
JOYLAND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$40,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER$30,000
UNITY WELLNESS CENTER OF EAMC$25,000
TWIN CEDARS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$25,000
PROJECT UPLIFT$20,000
EAST ALABAMA SERVICES FOR THE ELDERLY$20,000
EAST ALABAMA FOOD BANK$20,000
LEE COUNTY AMERICAN RED CROSS$17,500
CASA OF LEE COUNTY$15,000
KEEPING FAMILY CONNECTIONS$15,000
DOLLY PARTONS IMAGINATION LIBRARY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%AUBURN DAY CARE CENTERS: $34k → 15%JOYLAND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 22 repeat orgs$454k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
16

Total granted

$3.2M
$407k

Still filing today

0%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER LEE CO
    6× · 2017–2023 · $494k
  • LC
    LEE COUNTY AMERICAN RED CROSS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $271k
  • EA
    EAST ALABAMA MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS
    7× · 2018–2025 · $253k

Funded once

  • EA
    EAST ALABAMA MENTAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • ES
    EASTER SEALS ACHIEVEMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $39k
  • AD
    AUBURN DAY CARE CENTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $34k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER LEE CO: $494,375 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER LEE COLEE COUNTY AMERICAN RED CROSS: $270,500 · OtherLEE COUNTY AMERICAN RED CROSSEAST ALABAMA MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS: $252,850 · OtherEAST ALABAMA MENTAL HEALTH CENTERSJOYLAND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $223,750 · OtherJOYLAND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERLEE COUNTY LITERACY COALITION INC: $191,050 · OtherALABAMA SHERIFF'S GIRLS RANCH: $179,250 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER: $163,750 · OtherUNITY WELLNESS CENTER OF EAMC: $162,600 · OtherPROJECT UPLIFT: $157,000 · OtherTWIN CEDARS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $145,000 · OtherLEE COUNTY ALABAMA EASTER SEAL: $135,600 · OtherEAST ALABAMA SERVICES FOR THE ELDERLY: $135,000 · Other+29 more: $1,104,633 · Other+29 moreAUBURN DAY CARE CENTERS INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesJOYLAND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25,000 · Human Services
Other$3,615,358Human Services$59,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEE COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $25,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetJOYLAND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUBURN DAY CARE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds LEE COUNTY LITERACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds JOYLAND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Lee County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Lee County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Lee County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph