Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Erie County Inc

To increase the organized capacity for people to care for one another.

$212k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$601kYouth Development$223kPublic Benefit$172kPublic Safety & Disaster$123kHousing & Shelter$65kCrime & Legal$53kEmployment$48kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $198,483, the rows itemized in this filing. The $211,583 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $177k
$10,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHGO$30,000
SAFE HARBOUR SHELTER$25,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$20,000
ERIE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER$20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$17,000
SALVATION ARMY-SANDUSKY$15,000
KIWANIS CLUB OF SANDUSKY$10,400
KINSHIP$10,000
ERIE COUNTY CARE & SHARE$10,000
ERIE COUNTY CASA PROGRAM$10,000
COMMUNITY YOUTH MENTORING$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,583
RILEY'S ANGELS$6,500
CANCER SERVICES OF ERIE COUNTY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $24k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $12k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $18k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $17k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $14k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $12k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $12k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $11k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 19 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
13

Total granted

$1.2M
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+169%
+833%

Still filing today

21%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • O
    OH-GO
    6× · 2019–2024 · $132k · revenue +226%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +19%
  • CY
    COMMUNITY YOUTH MENTORING
    6× · 2019–2024 · $59k · revenue +169%

Funded once

  • SA
    SANDUSKY AREA YMCA
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • BS
    BLACK SWAMP AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Association of Youth Mentoring Inc

To train and support churches, ministries, and individuals in providing safe and effective mentoring to vulnerable youth and their families

Religion
2
Serving All Vessels Equally

Faith based youth leadership

Human Services
3
Central Mn Council of Boy Scouts of America

It is the mission of the boy scouts of america to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout law and oath.

—
4
Rocmnd Area Youth Services Inc

Provide aid to youth

Human Services
5
Piedmont Council Boy Scouts of America

Youth service.

—
6
Community Youth Services

Empowers youth at-risk and their families to meet goals for safety, stability, belonging and success by providing a continuum of individualized services and advocacy.

Human Services
7
Comprehensive Youth Services of Fresno Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing a full range of services to help eliminate child abuse and neglect. the organization strives to build healthy families through prevention, intervention, treatment and education about alternatives…

Crime & Legal
8
Community Child Care Connection Inc

To assist families and child care providers in obtaining education, and quality, affordable child care to help children and families reach their greatest potential.

Human Services
9
Relife Initiatives Corporation

Youth mentoring through a group of programs designed to build and restore self confidence and empowerment toward self discovery and identity establishment.

Education
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Montana

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
11
Boys & Girls Clubs of Cumberland County

To provide mentoring programs for at risk youth with educational and recreational opportunities that they normally may not be able to experience.

Crime & Legal
12
Coordinated Care Alliance

To provide senior support services

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oh-Go; the most unlike its peers is Rileys Angels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ERIE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $173,000 · OtherERIE COUNTY SENIOR CENTERSALVATION ARMY - SANDUSKY: $145,381 · OtherSALVATION ARMY - SANDUSKYVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $79,980 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICASAFE HARBOUR SHELTER: $65,000 · OtherSAFE HARBOUR SHELTERBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $62,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSCOMMUNITY YOUTH MENTORING: $58,995 · OtherCOMMUNITY YOUTH MENTORINGKIWANIS CLUB OF SANDUSKY: $53,100 · OtherERIE COUNTY CASA PROGRAM: $52,677 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $42,675 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA-SANDUSKY: $39,700 · Other+21 more: $304,396 · Other+21 moreOH-GO: $132,200 · Public BenefitOH-GOCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $129,624 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC C…KINSHIP INCORPORATED: $58,510 · Crime & LegalRILEYS ANGELS: $6,500 · Animals
Other$1,076,904Public Benefit$132,200Human Services$129,624Crime & Legal$58,510Animals$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOH-GO: $132,200 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $129,624 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH MENTORING: $58,995 over 6y, 17% of budgetKINSHIP INCORPORATED: $58,510 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetBLACK SWAMP AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $15,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANCER SERVICES FKA CANCER SERVICES OF ERIE COUNTY: $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OH-GO ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH MENTORING ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SANDUSKY AREA YMCA ↗
  • Who funds BLACK SWAMP AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds RILEYS ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SERVICES FKA CANCER SERVICES OF ERIE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sidney Frohman FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sidney Frohman Foundation · The Michelle Wightman-Karrie Wieber Charitable Foundation · The Mylander Fdn-2001 · Erie County Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Erie County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Erie County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Erie County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph