Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Big Spring & Howard

Funding to tax-exempt organizations in big spring and howard county to assist with their individual programs.

$155k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$107kHuman Services$98kHealth$73kCrime & Legal$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kCivil Rights$40kFood & Nutrition$27kPublic Benefit$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $151k
$11,982
Median grant
1
States reached
$513k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VICTIM SERVICES$16,992
WEST SIDE COMMUNITY DAYCARE$13,674
SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$13,320
EMERGENCY SERVICE CHAPLAIN CORP$13,248
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN$12,882
SALVATION ARMY$12,672
CASA OF WEST TEXAS$12,450
GOPB$11,982
MIDLAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER$11,640
JOURNEY HOME REFUGE CENTER$11,502
WEST TEXAS COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER$10,608
DAV CHAPTER 47$10,494
DONT LITTER AFFORDABLE CLINIC$9,474
SCENIC MTN MEDICAL CENTER VOLUNTEER$8,748
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$6,204
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $11k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$403k · 15 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$403k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+163%

Still filing today

13%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN
    3× · 2017–2024 · $45k
  • ES
    EMERGENCY SERVICE CHAPLAIN CORP
    3× · 2017–2024 · $41k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    3× · 2017–2024 · $41k

Funded once

  • I5
    ISAIAH 58
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue -34%
  • NC
    NORTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • DR
    DORA ROBERTS REHAB CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN — $44,932 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSNEMERGENCY SERVICE CHAPLAIN CORP — $41,368 · OtherEMERGENCY SERVICE CHAPLAIN CORPSALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $40,959 · OtherSALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBSALVATION ARMY — $35,293 · OtherSALVATION ARMYVICTIM SERVICES — $31,818 · OtherVICTIM SERVICESGOPB — $22,758 · OtherJOURNEY HOME REFUGE CENTER — $21,906 · OtherDONT LITTER AFFORDABLE CLINIC — $21,054 · OtherDAV CHAPTER 47 — $20,226 · OtherMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc — $19,158 · OtherWEST TEXAS COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER — $18,834 · OtherSCENIC MTN MEDICAL CENTER VOLUNTEER — $18,294 · OtherISAIAH 58 — $16,101 · Other+9 more — $110,875 · Other+9 moreCASA OF WEST TEXAS — $40,091 · Civil RightsHOWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $10,879 · Human Services
Other$463,576Civil Rights$40,091Human Services$10,879

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASA OF WEST TEXAS — $40,091 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc — $19,158 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetISAIAH 58 — $16,101 over 1y, 9.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA OF WEST TEXAS
  • Who funds Midland Rape Crisis Center Inc
  • Who funds ISAIAH 58
  • Who funds HOWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Big Spring & Howard funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph