Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Big Spring & Howard

Funding to tax-exempt organizations in big spring and howard county to assist with their individual programs.

$155k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$107kHuman Services$98kHealth$73kCrime & Legal$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kCivil Rights$40kFood & Nutrition$27kPublic Benefit$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $151k
$11,982
Median grant
1
States reached
$513k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VICTIM SERVICES$16,992
WEST SIDE COMMUNITY DAYCARE$13,674
SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$13,320
EMERGENCY SERVICE CHAPLAIN CORP$13,248
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN$12,882
SALVATION ARMY$12,672
CASA OF WEST TEXAS$12,450
GOPB$11,982
MIDLAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER$11,640
JOURNEY HOME REFUGE CENTER$11,502
WEST TEXAS COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER$10,608
DAV CHAPTER 47$10,494
DONT LITTER AFFORDABLE CLINIC$9,474
SCENIC MTN MEDICAL CENTER VOLUNTEER$8,748
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$6,204
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $11k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$403k · 15 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$403k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+163%

Still filing today

13%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN
    3× · 2017–2024 · $45k
  • ES
    EMERGENCY SERVICE CHAPLAIN CORP
    3× · 2017–2024 · $41k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    3× · 2017–2024 · $41k

Funded once

  • I5
    ISAIAH 58
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue -34%
  • NC
    NORTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • DR
    DORA ROBERTS REHAB CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN: $44,932 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSNEMERGENCY SERVICE CHAPLAIN CORP: $41,368 · OtherEMERGENCY SERVICE CHAPLAIN CORPSALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $40,959 · OtherSALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBSALVATION ARMY: $35,293 · OtherSALVATION ARMYVICTIM SERVICES: $31,818 · OtherVICTIM SERVICESGOPB: $22,758 · OtherJOURNEY HOME REFUGE CENTER: $21,906 · OtherDONT LITTER AFFORDABLE CLINIC: $21,054 · OtherDAV CHAPTER 47: $20,226 · OtherMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc: $19,158 · OtherWEST TEXAS COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER: $18,834 · OtherSCENIC MTN MEDICAL CENTER VOLUNTEER: $18,294 · OtherISAIAH 58: $16,101 · Other+9 more: $110,875 · Other+9 moreCASA OF WEST TEXAS: $40,091 · Civil RightsHOWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $10,879 · Human Services
Other$463,576Civil Rights$40,091Human Services$10,879

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA OF WEST TEXAS: $40,091 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc: $19,158 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetISAIAH 58: $16,101 over 1y, 9.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Midland Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH 58 ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Big Spring & Howard funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Big Spring & Howard. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Big Spring & Howard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph