Skip to content

Ohio · Public charity

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75

The purpose of the local is to organize, unite, and assist persons for the purpose of improving wages, hours, benefits and working conditions; to obtain the status of exclusive bargaining representative for the persons employed within the local's jurisdiction and to process and resolve grievances and all other rights arising out of such…

$130k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2024
8
Organizations funded FY2023
38%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$41k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$7,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 11
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$19M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 38% of the organizations United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 35% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$41k0%
FY20238$64k38%
FY20224$39k0%
FY20215$68k20%
FY20208$68k38%
FY201911$82kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$167kPhilanthropy$80kMembership Benefit$66kFood & Nutrition$16kEmployment$12kHuman Services$10kCivil Rights$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $94,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUfcw Local 75 Foundation Inc: $60,600 over 6y, 11% of budgetThe Loveall Foundation for Children: $45,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetShoot for a Cure: $40,690 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetUFCW 227 Foundation Inc: $21,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetUfcw 951 Marisa Didur Members Helping Members Foundation: $13,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetThe United Way of the Greater Dayton Area: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Express Foundation: $10,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSouth Pacific Charitable Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUnited Latinos of the UFCW Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetThe Kroger Co Foundation: $5,456 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio: $5,190 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Toledo: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFreestore Foodbank Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

United Food and Commercial Workers International UnionDC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Food and Commercial Workers International Union

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75 with peer funders

About United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75

How much does United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75 give?
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75 reported 5 itemized grants totaling $41,060, out of $129,703 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 11 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (46%), Philanthropy (22%), Membership Benefit (18%).
Who are United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Blood Cancer United Inc ($95k), Ufcw Local 75 Foundation Inc ($61k), The Loveall Foundation for Children ($45k).
Does United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75 fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 38% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United Food and Commercial Workers International Union.
Where is United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75 based?
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75 is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75’s filings →

More from the funding graph