Skip to content

Wisconsin · Public charity

Ubc & Ja Local No 231

The local union exists for the benefit of its members, for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

$18k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$6k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$6,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$6,000
States reached, FY2025
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Milwaukee Area Labor Council$6,00011%

Compare Ubc & Ja Local No 231 with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ubc & Ja Local No 231?

Find your warmest path to Ubc & Ja Local No 231 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Ubc & Ja Local No 231

How much does Ubc & Ja Local No 231 give?
Ubc & Ja Local No 231 reported 1 itemized grants totaling $6,000, out of $18,300 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Ubc & Ja Local No 231 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2025 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (100%).
Who are Ubc & Ja Local No 231's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: Milwaukee Area Labor Council ($6k).
Where is Ubc & Ja Local No 231 based?
Ubc & Ja Local No 231 is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $14k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2025, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph